[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zORv8wwiadQ]
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- arn on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- conrad ziefle on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- arn on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Billyjack on COP29 Preview
- dm on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- dm on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Tel on COP29 Preview
- Robertvd on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- GW on A Giant Eyesore
LOL,
I actually exchanged messages with this loon.It was about 3 years ago.
At first he agreed to join my forum to discuss his presentation.But when he realized that he was going to have to defend his crap openly.He bailed out.
He got easily mad over something minimal to make up an excuse why he should bail out.
His presentation has since not been supported by events of the last 3 years.
He is not a rational being.
Irrational behavoir seems to be the common denominator among warmists.
This most disturbing aspect of the video is the presenter’s unwavering faith in the execrable precautionary principle.
The video neglects to mention that the right hand column experiment (do nothing and wait to see if the doomsday shows up) has been running now since at least 1970- more than 4 decades. There are many quotes from Nobel-prize-winning experts that predicted doomsday well before 2000.
We already know that the doomsday stuff is nonsense.
Next.
Chris Y:
The Experiment of do nothing about controlling climate has been going on since the start of civilization. In spite of claims to the contrary over the years by so called prophets we are still here.
Steven: The header should be: The world will be destroyed bu 2017 IF we submit to the BS he is spewing!
The precautionary principle Demands we do nothing as there are to many unknowns in every scenario that has been provided.
Simpleton.
I do not even remember how many morons I have discussed this with This one is possibly one of them!
The effects of global warming, if any, are highly uncertain. If we drink the AGW Kool Aid, the results are highly certain-an economic depression, greatly reduced standard of living, and a huge increase in weather related fatalities due to lack of heating fuel and air conditioning. Plus God knows how many other unintended consequences.
“a huge increase in weather related fatalities due to lack of heating fuel and air conditioning”
Exactly. Wealthy nations are better equipped to deal with weather related disasters because we have the means to do so. To reduce that wealth would mean more deaths, not fewer – a huge step backward.
Every time I post my Global Warming Digest to the top ten “Global Warming” YouTube videos there is a sudden flurry of spastic posts that send my image links off the front discussion page. This being the top video hit, I have quite a bit of work to do each week to keep my work exposed on YouTube. At one point I noticed someone posting on one of their pet video a very passionate argument with himself playing both role of haloed alarmist and mean skeptic, but so sloppily as to sometimes forget which character he was puppeting, so phrases overlapped. But yeah, there’s no problem for trust fund mommy boys with taxing John Galt to feed John Gore.
His analysis is flawed. By his rational he should get a global economic depression in his entire column A because the costs are the same. That makes it a 100% certainty that the precautionary principle leads to economic catastrophe. An intelligent person would choose column B. At least that provides a 50/50 chance of a smiley face.
That’s what I said above – He’s a simpleton
Before I ever heard of a WattsUpWithThat, ClimateAudit, or RealScience I used to post “skeptic” comments on YouTube. It was the only show in town I knew of. I posted comments on this guys videos. He used to delete every one of them. And he sent me a couple of the most bizarre messages to my YouTube inbox. I don’t know if incoherent describes them. There was not even a pretense of civility.
After a while he stopped deleting my comments in his video threads and instead used them as an opportunity to give all the usual prefabricated rebuttals to “deniers”.
——————————————————————
Then one day I discovered ClimateAudit where there was real civility. Pretty tough to get a comment published sometimes. I think I still have post-traumatic ClimateAudit syndrome ;O)
That’s funny, while I never posted on you tube, my skepticism was confined to geek blogs, where I openly mocked alternative energy ideas that had no chance of working. CNET and the like. And then I found ClimateAudit…….. and yes, an entirely different way. I took me a while to figure out that the climate discussion wasn’t entirely a flame war.
Oh, flame wars were a regular feature at YouTube. I had 3 accounts (or more, I forget now) suspended because I was always reported as a spammer. My offense? I quoted from “skeptic” scientists.
The danger of letting an American have a white board and the ability to make a Utube video.
What I don’t get is how come he hasn’t given away all his money on the basis of doomsday prophesy already since percentages of things happening don’t matter. The worst case scenario for take action and the doomsayers are wrong is economic collapse plus climate change disasters which happens with or without humans so we do not have the means to respond to such disasters.
Check out the rolling introduction sentences of the 1987 movie “The Running Man”. Is this coincidence or what?