July 3, 2010
“The Arctic Ocean sea ice has been declining since summer solstice at rate of 170,000 square kilometres per day. For example, over the last weekend Friday to Sunday 25-27 June the sea ice area decreased 516,000 square kilometres, which equals at 170,000 km2 per day. The highest daily melting was 25.6 at 208,000 km2 of which 112,000 km2 occurred above the normal 1979-2008 melting. At current rate of 170,000 km2 per day all the ice would melt away by 8th August.”
Entire Arctic Ocean melted as early as August 8th, this year! « Climate Sanity
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- conrad ziefle on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Nicholas McGinley on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Nicholas McGinley on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- stewartpid on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Jehzsa on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Robertvd on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Bob G on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Walter on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
I see from your link I made a couple of comments on that post. I think my second one has stood the test of time.
Steve,
I get lots of good information from your blog, and I sincerely thank you for that. Could I however make a couple of suggestions? A newbie reading the above could see it as supporting the orthodoxy, not realizing that it is satire. Another area of ambiguity is in the presentation of graphs. Sometimes there is inadequate provision of legends. Here is an example:
http://tinyurl.com/c7qlcdr
Even with legends graphs can be mysterious to too many. The meaning is better spelled out. I believe that it is also important to illustrate the ‘global warming’ falsehoods and absurdities to the unenlightened.
I’ll repeat that I have found your site to be a great source of information.
“A newbie reading the above could see it as supporting the orthodoxy, not realizing that it is satire.”
If he’s an alarmist he will simply feel vindicated and continue to come back til he sees Steve’s Greenland wildlife photos. I think that’s a worthy goal to achieve.