July 3, 2010
“The Arctic Ocean sea ice has been declining since summer solstice at rate of 170,000 square kilometres per day. For example, over the last weekend Friday to Sunday 25-27 June the sea ice area decreased 516,000 square kilometres, which equals at 170,000 km2 per day. The highest daily melting was 25.6 at 208,000 km2 of which 112,000 km2 occurred above the normal 1979-2008 melting. At current rate of 170,000 km2 per day all the ice would melt away by 8th August.”
Entire Arctic Ocean melted as early as August 8th, this year! « Climate Sanity
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Terry Shipman on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Earlier Than Usual”
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gamecock on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gamecock on “Earlier Than Usual”
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
I see from your link I made a couple of comments on that post. I think my second one has stood the test of time.
Steve,
I get lots of good information from your blog, and I sincerely thank you for that. Could I however make a couple of suggestions? A newbie reading the above could see it as supporting the orthodoxy, not realizing that it is satire. Another area of ambiguity is in the presentation of graphs. Sometimes there is inadequate provision of legends. Here is an example:
http://tinyurl.com/c7qlcdr
Even with legends graphs can be mysterious to too many. The meaning is better spelled out. I believe that it is also important to illustrate the ‘global warming’ falsehoods and absurdities to the unenlightened.
I’ll repeat that I have found your site to be a great source of information.
“A newbie reading the above could see it as supporting the orthodoxy, not realizing that it is satire.”
If he’s an alarmist he will simply feel vindicated and continue to come back til he sees Steve’s Greenland wildlife photos. I think that’s a worthy goal to achieve.