July 3, 2010
“The Arctic Ocean sea ice has been declining since summer solstice at rate of 170,000 square kilometres per day. For example, over the last weekend Friday to Sunday 25-27 June the sea ice area decreased 516,000 square kilometres, which equals at 170,000 km2 per day. The highest daily melting was 25.6 at 208,000 km2 of which 112,000 km2 occurred above the normal 1979-2008 melting. At current rate of 170,000 km2 per day all the ice would melt away by 8th August.”
Entire Arctic Ocean melted as early as August 8th, this year! « Climate Sanity
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
Recent Comments
- mwhite on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- Bob G on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on “Siberia might stay livable”
- Timo, not that one! on “Siberia might stay livable”
I see from your link I made a couple of comments on that post. I think my second one has stood the test of time.
Steve,
I get lots of good information from your blog, and I sincerely thank you for that. Could I however make a couple of suggestions? A newbie reading the above could see it as supporting the orthodoxy, not realizing that it is satire. Another area of ambiguity is in the presentation of graphs. Sometimes there is inadequate provision of legends. Here is an example:
http://tinyurl.com/c7qlcdr
Even with legends graphs can be mysterious to too many. The meaning is better spelled out. I believe that it is also important to illustrate the ‘global warming’ falsehoods and absurdities to the unenlightened.
I’ll repeat that I have found your site to be a great source of information.
“A newbie reading the above could see it as supporting the orthodoxy, not realizing that it is satire.”
If he’s an alarmist he will simply feel vindicated and continue to come back til he sees Steve’s Greenland wildlife photos. I think that’s a worthy goal to achieve.