July 3, 2010
“The Arctic Ocean sea ice has been declining since summer solstice at rate of 170,000 square kilometres per day. For example, over the last weekend Friday to Sunday 25-27 June the sea ice area decreased 516,000 square kilometres, which equals at 170,000 km2 per day. The highest daily melting was 25.6 at 208,000 km2 of which 112,000 km2 occurred above the normal 1979-2008 melting. At current rate of 170,000 km2 per day all the ice would melt away by 8th August.”
Entire Arctic Ocean melted as early as August 8th, this year! « Climate Sanity
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Warming Twice As Fast
- Understanding Climate Science
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- Billyjack on Warming Twice As Fast
- dm on Warming Twice As Fast
- DABA13 on “what the science shows”
- DD More on Understanding Climate Science
- Bob G on Understanding Climate Science
- william on Understanding Climate Science
- arn on Understanding Climate Science
- Scott Allen on Understanding Climate Science
- william on Understanding Climate Science
- arn on Understanding Climate Science
I see from your link I made a couple of comments on that post. I think my second one has stood the test of time.
Steve,
I get lots of good information from your blog, and I sincerely thank you for that. Could I however make a couple of suggestions? A newbie reading the above could see it as supporting the orthodoxy, not realizing that it is satire. Another area of ambiguity is in the presentation of graphs. Sometimes there is inadequate provision of legends. Here is an example:
http://tinyurl.com/c7qlcdr
Even with legends graphs can be mysterious to too many. The meaning is better spelled out. I believe that it is also important to illustrate the ‘global warming’ falsehoods and absurdities to the unenlightened.
I’ll repeat that I have found your site to be a great source of information.
“A newbie reading the above could see it as supporting the orthodoxy, not realizing that it is satire.”
If he’s an alarmist he will simply feel vindicated and continue to come back til he sees Steve’s Greenland wildlife photos. I think that’s a worthy goal to achieve.