July 3, 2010
“The Arctic Ocean sea ice has been declining since summer solstice at rate of 170,000 square kilometres per day. For example, over the last weekend Friday to Sunday 25-27 June the sea ice area decreased 516,000 square kilometres, which equals at 170,000 km2 per day. The highest daily melting was 25.6 at 208,000 km2 of which 112,000 km2 occurred above the normal 1979-2008 melting. At current rate of 170,000 km2 per day all the ice would melt away by 8th August.”
Entire Arctic Ocean melted as early as August 8th, this year! « Climate Sanity
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
Recent Comments
- Crashex on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Mike on Climate Scamming For Profit
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Francis Barnett on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Bob G on Time Of Observation Bias
- arn on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Crashex on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Robertvd on Climate Scamming For Profit
I see from your link I made a couple of comments on that post. I think my second one has stood the test of time.
Steve,
I get lots of good information from your blog, and I sincerely thank you for that. Could I however make a couple of suggestions? A newbie reading the above could see it as supporting the orthodoxy, not realizing that it is satire. Another area of ambiguity is in the presentation of graphs. Sometimes there is inadequate provision of legends. Here is an example:
http://tinyurl.com/c7qlcdr
Even with legends graphs can be mysterious to too many. The meaning is better spelled out. I believe that it is also important to illustrate the ‘global warming’ falsehoods and absurdities to the unenlightened.
I’ll repeat that I have found your site to be a great source of information.
“A newbie reading the above could see it as supporting the orthodoxy, not realizing that it is satire.”
If he’s an alarmist he will simply feel vindicated and continue to come back til he sees Steve’s Greenland wildlife photos. I think that’s a worthy goal to achieve.