“I can not tell a lie”
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “carbon emissions may have now peaked”
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
- “4th Hottest Summer”
- Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
Recent Comments
- Terry Shipman on “4th Hottest Summer”
- Bob G on Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
- Bob G on “4th Hottest Summer”
- Ulric Lyons on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Gordon Vigurs on Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
- Gordon Vigurs on Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
- Tel on Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
- Bob G on Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
- conrad ziefle on “getting smaller”
- arn on Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
This seems like a good spot to rerun my comment I just left at a warmist site: http://insideclimatenews.org/news/20120507/television-meteorologists-climate-change-skeptics-weather-global-warming-john-coleman-james-span-joseph-daleo#comment-11869
There’s talk about the “problem” of meteorologists not going along with the supposed consensus. Yet you could just as easily see it as a problem that climate scientists, or at least the younger ones, are like a solid, virtually unanimous block in their support of AGW. No deviation, marching in goosestep. This unanimity is puzzling, considering the richness of the debate, and how easy it would be to play devils advocate.
The problem is that far from being unbiased and impartial, climate scientists, at least the post 1990 vintage, had to agree with the AGW theory in order to be acccepted into their doctorate programs. So, today, climate scientists represent little more than a rubber stamp for AGW.
Thus the inescapble conclusion is that climate scientist cannot be considered an independent, unbiased, credible source of information… on climate.
Keith Briffa – meet dark underside of bus.
cheer-io, Mike Mann [p.s. I knew you never had the stomach to “do what was necessary” for The Team]
I guess “The One” has spoken! It is a Mann’s World indeed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juTeHsKPWhY&feature=related