In 1987, Ronald Reagan stood in Berlin and said “Tear down this wall!”
Two years later, NOAA did a study concluding that there had been no warming in the US since 1895.
U.S. Data Since 1895 Fail To Show Warming Trend
By PHILIP SHABECOFF, Special to the New York Times
Published: January 26, 1989After examining climate data extending back nearly 100 years, a team of Government scientists has concluded that there has been no significant change in average temperatures or rainfall in the United States over that entire period.
While the nation’s weather in individual years or even for periods of years has been hotter or cooler and drier or wetter than in other periods, the new study shows that over the last century there has been no trend in one direction or another.
The study, made by scientists for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration was published in the current issue of Geophysical Research Letters. It is based on temperature and precipitation readings taken at weather stations around the country from 1895 to 1987.
U.S. Data Since 1895 Fail To Show Warming Trend – New York Times
In 1999, Hansen concluded the same thing
Empirical evidence does not lend much support to the notion that climate is headed precipitately toward more extreme heat and drought. The drought of 1999 covered a smaller area than the 1988 drought, when the Mississippi almost dried up. And 1988 was a temporary inconvenience as compared with repeated droughts during the 1930s “Dust Bowl” that caused an exodus from the prairies, as chronicled in Steinbeck’s Grapes of Wrath…..
in the U.S. there has been little temperature change in the past 50 years, the time of rapidly increasing greenhouse gases — in fact, there was a slight cooling throughout much of the country
Less than a year later, Hansen and Tom Karl rewrote the US temperature record – to produce more than 1C warming from 1895 to 1987.
Many people gave their lives to protect America from the Soviet Union. Little did we realize that people of the Soviet mentality were taking over our own government.
Yeah, but
deceitscience has progressed so much further since thenThe Wall of Deceit Secretly Constructed by World Leaders in 1945-46
Fear of “nuclear fires” that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in July 1945 and the instinct of survival convinced world leaders to take control of the news media and to save the world and themselves from the threat of nuclear war by
a.) Establishing the United Nations in October 1945
b.) Obscuring information on the Sun’s energy 1946
c.) Steadily reducing nationalism & racism after 1946
d.) Ending the space and nuclear arms race in 1971
e.) Manipulating astronomy, astrophysics, climatology, cosmology, nuclear particle, planetary, solar and space science until finally exposed by Climategate emails and documents in 2009
This history of these events is documented in ten (10) papers and five (5) videos here:
http://omanuel.wordpress.com/about/
And a microscopic view of 1945-1946 events here:
http://omanuel.wordpress.com/about/#comment-70
As we honor those who made the supreme sacrifice for our past constitutional freedoms and limits on government this Memorial Day, it is a good time to reflect on the recent speech by the Czech President, Václav Klaus:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/05/23/text-of-vaclav-klaus-heartland-institute-conference-speech/
And his book, “Blue Planet in Green Shackles: What Is Endangered: Climate or Freedom?”
http://www.amazon.com/Blue-Planet-Green-Shackles-Endangered/dp/1889865095/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1338080607&sr=1-1
There is no more important information for citizens to understand as we honor those who made the supreme sacrifice on Memorial Day to preserve the freedoms we enjoyed in the past.
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
http://www.omatumr.com
http://omanuel.wordpress.com/about/
There is no more important information for citizens to understand as we honor those who made the supreme sacrifice on Memorial Day to preserve the freedoms we enjoyed in the past.
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
http://www.omatumr.com
http://omanuel.wordpress.com/about/
Even more hilarious considering who the author of that first 1989 NY Times article is — Phil Shabecoff. He is one of the founders of the Society of Environmental Journalists in 1991. In 2000, when asked to give a speech to his fellow SEJ’ers about “the globe in the year 2100” ( http://ecoethics.net/hsev/NewScience/Shabecoff-SEJ.htm ), he concluded with this gem:
“….we will need a new politics, a new geopolitics, a new economic model, new technologies and new ethics. It will require far more equity in the distribution of the world’s resources and wealth… If something approaching this scenario takes place, our great grandchildren will live in a relatively clean, healthy world, with just about enough of everything to go around. It will be somewhat hotter, of course. Climate change has probably progressed to the point where it will take more than a century to reverse…The rich no doubt will still be around and will be able to command a more than their share of what the earth and human labor produce…. And if, by some miracle, the population tide is reversed and brought down, say, to what it was when I was born, around 2 billion, it can truly be a golden age—a world of plenty with every human sharing fully in its bounty.”
Gosh, and in his own description of how he was let go from the NY Times in 1991 ( http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reports/article/101346/The-Environment-Beats-Rocky-Terrain.aspx ) he tells us how the newspaper thought he “had grown too close to my sources in the environmental movement and that my reporting focused too much on threats to the environment.”
Could be he wrote the ‘Fail To Show Warming Trend’ 1989 article under protest and really wanted to tell us all how we were going to die in a global meltdown. Don’t even get me started about his connections to the accusation that skeptic climate scientists are corrupt…….