April 28 was the last update at CT. I hope everything is OK.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
Recent Comments
- mwhite on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- Bob G on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on “Siberia might stay livable”
- Timo, not that one! on “Siberia might stay livable”
Since ice is normal and nothing is trending toward an ice free arctic all of the computers and other measuring data must be broken.
Purple shrouds? Black Nikes?
Maybe the loss of Envisat has badly crimped their data collection.
http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEM1SXSWT1H_index_0.html
I noticed this too.
I hope no one hijacked their website.
Anyone know which satellites monitor sea ice?
SSMI – the same one used by everyone else.
Why am I not surprised? Using the data from the 27th of April, arctic and antarctic taken together show ice cover to be above normal for this time of the year. Maybe arctic ice cover is now by itself above the lnormal level of between 1970 and 2000 and for political reasons it is not being shown. Evidence casting doubts about global warming is maybe not acceptable. Another piece of the puzzle is that the areas above 2000 metres in the European alps show as yet no sign of the annual spring melt. Something is going on and maybe we are not being informed. This is only speculation ofcourse but when there is an induced fog upon facts, suspicions do form.