Looks like Bob at Weather Underground is predicting an ice-free Arctic in three years, because he has faith in PIOMAS. Good luck with that Bob.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
Recent Comments
- Bob G on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Francis Barnett on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Jimmy Haigh on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- czechlist on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Jimmy Haigh on The Anti-Greta
- Jimmy Haigh on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on The Anti-Greta
- Gamecock on The Anti-Greta
So he makes Arctic ice predictions, based upon a pond in his back yard.
How Hansenesque!
What is all that white stuff we see up north this June? I certainly don’t think it is dog manure.
Where is it?
http://www.wunderground.com/blog/BobWallace/show.html
Hmm. Maybe he deleted everything?
Steve, you ever post there or just lurking? I used to go there mainly for hurricane updates but agh, liberals had to ruin that for me. Every once in a while, I pop in and troll there with your charts for the fun of it. I’m surprised I wasn’t banned but probably put on “ignored list”.
No, Any comment section where you have to sign in is a no-go for me.
Is Bob aware that PIOMAS is a model, not an observation and their model is departing from reality. How long will the ice volume charade continue?
In three years, Arctic Ice will be negative
https://sites.google.com/site/arctischepinguin/home/piomas/piomas-trnd2.png
He based it off of this picture. Does anyone believe this will never happen? All the months of the year show a very strong trend. If this doesn’t happen till the end of the decade, does that mean AGW is invalid?
If this isn’t agw doing this, then what is the explanation? The doubters fall incredibly short in this area.
Interesting thought is why Bob Wallace of all people?
Why are you choosing to single him out?