Suppose that a CEO was unhappy with a 70 year downward trend in his company’s revenues, so he told his accountants to develop a new accounting method which shows an increase. Then he erased the original raw data from the company website, and presented the new graphs without mention of the change in accounting practices. Chances are that law enforcement would be hauling him away in the not too distant future.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
- Geoengineering To Save The Planet
Recent Comments
- arn on 100% Wind By 2030
- gordon vigurs on 100% Wind By 2030
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- dm on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Jehzsa on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
keep the proof!
Has Hansen ever made a cold biased adjustment? If I were him, I would do it maybe one time in 10 to at least give some appearance of objectivity. Maybe Hansen is so arrogant, he doesn’t care about an appearance of objectivity.
What you are describing is the accounting system used by our federal government and Hansen is using the same approach. For example, not creating enough jobs by traditional measures? Then create a new accounting method using “jobs saved”. Don’t want the public to know that your health care bill will cost them billions while reducing benefits? Change the accounting and only count 7 years of costs while collecting 10 years of revenue and thus make the program look as if it will save the public money over ten years. It has been proven that when people substitute hope and change for rational thought, this type of accounting is preferred.
Hey Sundance, you are correct in your assessment. It is appalling that America has sunk so low intellectialy as to accept what the Hansens and Jones and Manns are saying. That these third rate technicians are fooling so many people is absurd. Of course, they have the help of a corrupt press corp that thinks lieing is the way to go.
If you keep posting links to NASA sites to support your articles your rights to access the links will be removed – cease and desist.