Global warming ‘hiatus’ in recent years helps spur skepticism | OregonLive.com
h/t to GORE LIED
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
Recent Comments
- Scott Allen on “getting smaller”
- Greg in NZ on NASA Sea Level
- arn on “getting smaller”
- Gordon Vigurs on “fair & equitable”
- Gordon Vigurs on Michael Mann Continues His War
- Gordon Vigurs on Michael Mann Continues His War
- Bob G on “getting smaller”
- arn on “getting smaller”
- Hank Phillips on “getting smaller”
- Francis Barnett on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
Oregon is filled with dimwitted libs. They ran a story about how Lake Powell was about to dry up, and I sent them the link to the Lake Powell web site. It got thru to someone because they wrote back asking if they could use my comments in a followup article.
A couple of quick questions:
1. What is the correct temperature of the Earth? Is it as implied by the headline above the temperature of the Earth in 1895?
2. If so, what is special about 1895? Is it possible that 1895 was; a) Colder than usual; b) poorly measured?
3. Did those predicting it will get hotter from now on, predict the decade + stall in heat rise we have seen? No? If not, then what lends credibility to their forecast of hotter temperatures?
4. According to the article, “The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts warming of 2 degrees to 11 degrees in the 21st century, depending in part on how much fossil fuel the world burns.”
But then later states: “Explanations [for the lack of warming] include ramped-up coal burning in Asia, which increases short-lived spurts of sulfur-dioxide that dampen temperatures. So if the energy is produced in Asia it cools the Earth – short-term. Hmmm. What is “short-term”? A month? A year? A decade? A century? Five minutes?
What is “short-term”? A month? A year? A decade? A century? Five minutes?
It’s a
fudge factorparameter – it can be whatever you need it to be to support ‘the cause’.Good answer!
Who is deciding what are the warmest months? If they are the usual suspects with their usual baised extrapolations and adjustments, the statement is nothing but political propaganda.