I agree that often sensationalism in the media is unchecked, unabashed and distasteful, but that’s nothing new and present in both sides. After all, how many articles did we read about “Climategate?” (Which was debunked.)
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
Recent Comments
- Trevor on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- czechlist on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- arn on COP29 Preview
- arn on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- stewartpid on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on A Giant Eyesore
- GeologyJim on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on COP29 Preview
At least they’ve named themselves appropriately; that’s all they’re spouting.
Nor did the MWP, the heat of the 1930’s was imagined, and there was definitely no ice age scare in the 1970’s.
Unlearn something new everyday!
How can you debunk a scandal?
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.
Here’s my attempt to state the problem succinctly. Comments/suggestions would be appreciated:
The Problem: World Leaders Were Separated From Reality in 1945
They cannot possibly lead society in ignorance of the “fountain of energy” that made our elements, sustains our lives, controls the Earth’s climate, and powered inquisitive minds and creative talents of our most celebrated religious leaders, scientists, artists and philosophers to unanimously agree:
Mankind’s greatest accomplishments come from this free-flowing stream of energy.
http://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/sun_cme.jpg
http://omanuel.wordpress.com/about/#comment-284
With kind regards,
-Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
http://www.omatumr.com
Oliver,
I have an astronomy question for you. Two of Saturn’s moons, orbiting right beside each other, the one Hyperion, an airless football shaped rock, the other Titan, a planet in it’s own right, with storms and seas and rivers of liquid methane rolling through canyons on it’s surface.
Temperature on Hyperion is ?180 °C. Temperature on Titan is ?179.5 °C.
The question, where is the global warming?
Why are you playing net nanny with me all of a sudden?
Climategate is STILL happening!
I’d love to have seen Climategate 3.0 appear, just moments after that idiocy was spouted.
Lol, what was debunked about it? When was it debunked? Do they not understand that they can’t lie anymore. No one believes them.
Because the quotes were ‘taken out of context’. Except when you read them in context, they come out sounding even worse. 😉
Hmm, sort of like that recent fellow who said, “You didn’t build that.” Turns out, the context is worse than the quote by a good bit. Funny that.
The Past Happened like your Government tells you It Happened.
They just said on ABC News that the ice in Greenland melted ! Seriously, they did.
Big Brother would never lie to us, would he?
Sorry, I missed this.
What was it that “climategate” proved about anything?
I mean, obviously, it must have proved that lots of scientists were lying, about everything, and so on, but in what possible way was this story ever “bunked”?
Watergate didn`t prove that Nixon lied about everything. It proved that his character was very poor, just like your hero fraudsters on the climate side.
Steven,
In what way was “Climategate” ever “bunked”?
What is your issue? 5,000 e-mails – no evidence, of what? I really have yet to work out even what the accusation is….
Climate scientists send each other e-mails!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Clear evidence of what exactly? Obviously, it’s “climategate”, because the e-mails were stolen and the whole world get to overhear their private conversations. in which, no evidence of fraud, conspiracy, criminality…
There is clearly a criminal fraudulent conspiracy involved, among those who have hacked, leaked and distributed these e-mails.
OH! I get it! You think that the Democrats should have been prosecuted for being the victims of the Watergate break-in.
I`m sorry that your standards are so low.
A couple of comments from the linked hotair green room article, first from The Schaef:
And from majordomomojo:
Eh? Climategate was “debunked”? So, they read all 5,000 e-mails?
The warmists should practice what they preach. AGW is nearly “debunked”, but they still bitch about how those little e-mails were “taken out of context”. They are all there, in their entirety, and do the alarmists read them? Nope.
The article sounds like it was written by John Cook.