NASA is obsessed with three or four of hours when temperatures got barely above freezing.
Someone parked their golf cart on the green again.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
Recent Comments
- Trevor on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- czechlist on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- arn on COP29 Preview
- arn on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- stewartpid on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on A Giant Eyesore
- GeologyJim on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on COP29 Preview
I don’t see the water hazard. Is it behind the palm trees?
It is one big water hazard. The water just happens to be solid.
No, the melted water on summit refreezes.
The hazard was more dwon the hill.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrIX-WzWA8k
Produce a picture of any melted water at summit
Greenland gets 400 billion cubic metres of snow per year, and alarmists expect it all to just accumulate until it reaches the top of the stratosphere.
You might want to look up ‘steady state equilibrium”
Here you go. The clear line ~2cm from the top is melted, refrozen water. At Summit, the previous melt layer dates to 1889. The average over the last 10,000 years has been one melt layer per 150 years, although there is a significant cluster around the HOlocent climate optimum, meaning that the recent rate has been around one melt layer per 250 years.
http://dartmouthigert.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/summitfirnmelt2small2.jpg?w=355&h=266
That bridge over the Watson river was very poorly designed. They basically built a dam out of moraine into which they put two small spans of bridge, the outlets being much smaller in area than the former river bed. What a surprise when the river backs up behind the moraine dam and eventually over-tops it. Moraine is not really good dam building material. They should have used a bridge with numerous piers from bank to bank that don’t significantly block the river channel.
Further to my last – see picture number 4 here:
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2010/04/icelands_disruptive_volcano.html
Here’s the big picture of the Watson River bridge:
http://www.panoramio.com/photo_explorer#view=photo&position=240&with_photo_id=6637651&order=date_desc&user=1198149
Look at the size of the outwash plain downstream of the bridge in the bottom right hand corner. It was accident begging to happen!
Reblogged this on SERMERSUAQ.
My goodness, it gets above freezing for 2 hours and 10,000 feet of ice are all gone!