USHCN daily data : us.txt.gz
GISS US: data data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/Fig.D.txt
Current NCDC data : CONTIGUOUS UNITED STATES Climate Summary
The graph above plots published GISS US temperature anomalies, minus the difference between published USHCN temperatures and their raw data (scaled for centigrade of course.)
GISS is based on USHCN, and without their adjustments there is no warming trend since at least 1895.
Kudos. If this is true, it is a very important finding. Did you do the analysis and graphing? I wish you would provide links to the two data sources and the combined data set. This needs to be spread more widely.
We are recovering from the Little Ice Age, so we should naturally see a rise in temps over the last 150 years or so, but without the “adjustments” we see no trend at all, NO warming for all this time. No global warming of any sort when we should see warming. Time for the Prophets of Doom to pack it up, and admit that they had been trying to pull a fast one over us for a long time.
Oh, and one other thing that’s not mentioned enough, contrary to what the ipcc claimed, there is NO evidence that CO2 causes climate warming. Click my name to see a must-share 3 minute video exposing the ipcc deception on CO2.
So, given that there’s no obvious warming, and CO2 has arguably nothing to do with the climate, why don’t they change the name of their theory to “climate change” or something like that so warming is not part of it, and start talking about other non-CO2 based reasons (still caused by industry!) for the non-warming based climate change. Just an idea. Then Obama could say, “though there is no warming, and CO2 is immaterial to climate, nevertheless: Forward with De-industrialization!”
Man-made global warming – has nothing to do with climate.
Adjustments? Someone should be screaming FRAUD at this obamanation/corruption of science. Disgusting!
Steve,
Aren’t the adjustments largely due to TOBS and subjective UHI calculations? At least that’s what I thought.
I have no idea. These adjustments are much (400%) larger than what they explain.on their web site.