I just captured this screenshot from Google News
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
Recent Comments
- Bob G on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Francis Barnett on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Jimmy Haigh on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- czechlist on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Jimmy Haigh on The Anti-Greta
- Jimmy Haigh on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on The Anti-Greta
- Gamecock on The Anti-Greta
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.
after the president of the company proclaimed that it is unapologetically in favor of traditional marriage
In favor of traditional marriage? Shocking. Are they going to outlaw traditional marriage? I wouldn’t be surprised, and the future holds that anyone who wants to have a traditional marriage will be tarred and feathered as undiverse racists and unapologetic *******aphobes.
Oh, I forgot to say that it’s certainly strange to see the odd merger of these two issues in the news report(s). And Steven, your coverage of the Greenland deceptions was lauded at iceagenow: http://iceagenow.info/2012/07/scientists-shoot-holes-latest-nasa-greenland-hysteria/
One other thing. Look at the way I’ve done the youtube link tied to my name above. I don’t like it that youtube links always carry no info about what the video is. So, you might click it into a tab, but that’s a potential waste of a bit of time if you don’t know what you’re getting. So… I just appended some stuff to the url to provide some descriptive info. I added “&desc=GGWarmingSwindle_CO2Lag”, as you can see by mousing over my name. So this is something that anyone here can do to improve their youtube links. Just keep the descriptive part short.
Has the discussion not moved beyond this? There is now the whole ‘poly’-thing (don’t you know, the ‘new’ ‘gay-thing’?) Where (loving – of course) people want to be married in groups, and children are to have 3 (or more) (loving – of course) parents.
Apparently, there are like 500k such people in the USA today. Wow! That means it, like, must be OK then! There have been there all along, they are our neighbors, our parents, our children!
Mmmm… where have I heard all this before?
What’s next? Given the prevalence of pedophilia, are we all to except that then? Well, if the government SAYS so, then, obviously, we MUST. After all, if the Gov makes abortion LEGAL, then we, like, HAVE to accept it, right?
The slippery-slope was, perhaps, all along rather towards this final state.
Consider: (http://wmbriggs.com/blog/?p=5933), then just imagine how well this new business will work out.
Yep. I am just POSITIVE that a whole bunch of strangers will just, like, you know, take JUST as good care of the children of strangers as of their own. Then again, looking at the numbers in linked post, we can expect more child-rape, more suicide, and all around more f-ed-up children.
But, hey. They are ALL in loving, stable, honest people, is lasting relationships… right? Why even thinking otherwise is bound to be against the Thought Crime (sorry, ‘Hate Crime’) laws!
There are times when I really can’t wait for Doomsday.
Traditional marriage is causing irreversible ice melt and destroying the planet? Wowzers! It’s time for Al Gore to step up and marry a gay penguin to save the planet. 🙂
Ugh. Please spare us the mind-pictures. Just lost my dinner.
Why should gay rights be “wed” to the global warming agenda? Gays have every rreason to protect their rights, but why the hell did they have to latch on to word “marriage”. That has always been a religious based heterosexual institution. Gays co-opting that word annoys a lot of people who might otherwise be sympathetic. Why not “life partnerships” or invent their own word?