Greenland Melt Now Impacting Gay Rights At Chick-fil-A

7 Responses to Greenland Melt Now Impacting Gay Rights At Chick-fil-A

1. kim2ooo says:

   July 27, 2012 at 3:22 am

   Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.

   Reply
2. Eric Simpson says:

   July 27, 2012 at 3:47 am

   after the president of the company proclaimed that it is unapologetically in favor of traditional marriage

   In favor of traditional marriage? Shocking. Are they going to outlaw traditional marriage? I wouldn’t be surprised, and the future holds that anyone who wants to have a traditional marriage will be tarred and feathered as undiverse racists and unapologetic *******aphobes.

   Reply
   • Eric Simpson says:

     July 27, 2012 at 7:24 am

     Oh, I forgot to say that it’s certainly strange to see the odd merger of these two issues in the news report(s). And Steven, your coverage of the Greenland deceptions was lauded at iceagenow: http://iceagenow.info/2012/07/scientists-shoot-holes-latest-nasa-greenland-hysteria/
     One other thing. Look at the way I’ve done the youtube link tied to my name above. I don’t like it that youtube links always carry no info about what the video is. So, you might click it into a tab, but that’s a potential waste of a bit of time if you don’t know what you’re getting. So… I just appended some stuff to the url to provide some descriptive info. I added “&desc=GGWarmingSwindle_CO2Lag”, as you can see by mousing over my name. So this is something that anyone here can do to improve their youtube links. Just keep the descriptive part short.

     Reply
3. cb says:

   July 27, 2012 at 6:57 am

   Has the discussion not moved beyond this? There is now the whole ‘poly’-thing (don’t you know, the ‘new’ ‘gay-thing’?) Where (loving – of course) people want to be married in groups, and children are to have 3 (or more) (loving – of course) parents.

   Apparently, there are like 500k such people in the USA today. Wow! That means it, like, must be OK then! There have been there all along, they are our neighbors, our parents, our children!
   Mmmm… where have I heard all this before?

   What’s next? Given the prevalence of pedophilia, are we all to except that then? Well, if the government SAYS so, then, obviously, we MUST. After all, if the Gov makes abortion LEGAL, then we, like, HAVE to accept it, right?
   The slippery-slope was, perhaps, all along rather towards this final state.

   Consider: (http://wmbriggs.com/blog/?p=5933), then just imagine how well this new business will work out.

   Yep. I am just POSITIVE that a whole bunch of strangers will just, like, you know, take JUST as good care of the children of strangers as of their own. Then again, looking at the numbers in linked post, we can expect more child-rape, more suicide, and all around more f-ed-up children.

   But, hey. They are ALL in loving, stable, honest people, is lasting relationships… right? Why even thinking otherwise is bound to be against the Thought Crime (sorry, ‘Hate Crime’) laws!

   There are times when I really can’t wait for Doomsday.

   Reply
4. Sundance says:

   July 27, 2012 at 4:03 pm

   Traditional marriage is causing irreversible ice melt and destroying the planet? Wowzers! It’s time for Al Gore to step up and marry a gay penguin to save the planet. 🙂

   Reply
   • I. Lou Minotti says:

     July 27, 2012 at 11:10 pm

     Ugh. Please spare us the mind-pictures. Just lost my dinner.

     Reply
5. DC Andy says:

   July 27, 2012 at 7:42 pm

   Why should gay rights be “wed” to the global warming agenda? Gays have every rreason to protect their rights, but why the hell did they have to latch on to word “marriage”. That has always been a religious based heterosexual institution. Gays co-opting that word annoys a lot of people who might otherwise be sympathetic. Why not “life partnerships” or invent their own word?

   Reply