Hansen pulled the same trick in Tokyo that he did in Phoenix. The black and white is his 1999 UHI adjusted graph, and the blue is his current graph. He cooled the past by about a degree in order to create a non-existent warming trend.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Visitech.ai – Data Made Simple – Weather History
- First Tracks In The Snow
- UK Green Energy Record
- UN Is Upset
- “Fascist Salute”
- Record Warmth Of January 1906
- Heat Trapping Difficulties
- Visitech – Data Made Simple – Antarctic Sea Ice
- Visitech – Data Made Simple
- California Governor Refused Firefighting Help
- Internet For Drowned Island
- A Toast To President Trump
- 97% Of Government Experts Agree
- Green Energy Progress
- Scientists Concerned
- New Data Tampering By NOAA
- Magical Thermometers
- Responsive Government In California
- Collapse Of The Antarctic Sea Ice Scam
- NPR : Cold And Snow Caused By Global Warming
- Snow Forecast In All 53 States
- 97% Consensus
- “Melting ice reveals millennia-old forest buried in the Rocky mountains”
- America Burning
- Mediterranean Britain
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Heat Trapping Difficulties
- Brian G Valentine on Visitech.ai – Data Made Simple – Weather History
- Disillusioned on Heat Trapping Difficulties
- Brian G Valentine on First Tracks In The Snow
- dm on First Tracks In The Snow
- arn on UK Green Energy Record
- dm on UK Green Energy Record
- Greg in NZ on UN Is Upset
- Brian G Valentine on UK Green Energy Record
- arn on UK Green Energy Record
It would be interesting to graph the differences. You’d do a better job of that than me.
I wonder how minima appearing in the rural temps don’t happen to be minima in the city temps of the 1999 data
Hansen as clearly put a skew in this centered around the year 1980
Afaik, the Japan Meteorological Agency and its predecessors have records covering this period and going back much further.
Have the Hansen charts and their revisions been blessed by them?
While on the revision topic, was there ever a conclusion to the Reykjavik temperature adjustment debate?
Jim Hansen is the O J Simpson of climatology. He doesn’t have to answer for anything.
Any interested observer would note that during the time the US naval machinery in WWII got close to Japan in 1945, Tokyo (and most of the island) experienced by far the coldest year during the last Century.
This could be particularly observed few miles away from Tokyo
__at the west coast http://www.seatraining.de/H/Hi/hb-5.jpg , and
__at the east coast http://www.seatraining.de/H/Hi/hb-6.jpg
__and other locations as well.: http://www.seaclimate.com/h/images/buch/h_5.jpg
However, any one interested not to make James Hansen’s life and of his companions at IPCC etc too difficult, should not ask questions about the reasons for the extraordinary low temperatures throughout Japan just at the time when the Allies fought close to Japan’s shore., which is discussed here: http://www.seaclimate.com/h/h.html