Hansen pulled the same trick in Tokyo that he did in Phoenix. The black and white is his 1999 UHI adjusted graph, and the blue is his current graph. He cooled the past by about a degree in order to create a non-existent warming trend.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
- Geoengineering To Save The Planet
- Geoengineering Genocide
- No Crime On Capitol Hill
- Chief Scientist And Religious Leader
- Heroes Saving The Climate
- “15 DAYS TO SLOW THE SPREAD”
- “Gell-Mann Amnesia effect”
- Socialism Couldn’t Save The Glaciers
- Record Slow Ice Melt
- “I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help”
- Latest Research In Climate Science
- UK Sucking Carbon
- Price-Free Tesla
- Four Years Past The Deadline
Recent Comments
- arn on The Savior Of Humanity
- william on The Savior Of Humanity
- arn on President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Robertvd on President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- gordon vigurs on Net Zero In Europe
- arn on Net Zero In Europe
- gordon vigurs on Net Zero In Europe
- arn on The Savior Of Humanity
- gordon vigurs on Net Zero In Europe
- Walter on The Canadian Hockey Stick
It would be interesting to graph the differences. You’d do a better job of that than me.
I wonder how minima appearing in the rural temps don’t happen to be minima in the city temps of the 1999 data
Hansen as clearly put a skew in this centered around the year 1980
Afaik, the Japan Meteorological Agency and its predecessors have records covering this period and going back much further.
Have the Hansen charts and their revisions been blessed by them?
While on the revision topic, was there ever a conclusion to the Reykjavik temperature adjustment debate?
Jim Hansen is the O J Simpson of climatology. He doesn’t have to answer for anything.
Any interested observer would note that during the time the US naval machinery in WWII got close to Japan in 1945, Tokyo (and most of the island) experienced by far the coldest year during the last Century.
This could be particularly observed few miles away from Tokyo
__at the west coast http://www.seatraining.de/H/Hi/hb-5.jpg , and
__at the east coast http://www.seatraining.de/H/Hi/hb-6.jpg
__and other locations as well.: http://www.seaclimate.com/h/images/buch/h_5.jpg
However, any one interested not to make James Hansen’s life and of his companions at IPCC etc too difficult, should not ask questions about the reasons for the extraordinary low temperatures throughout Japan just at the time when the Allies fought close to Japan’s shore., which is discussed here: http://www.seaclimate.com/h/h.html