Hansen pulled the same trick in Tokyo that he did in Phoenix. The black and white is his 1999 UHI adjusted graph, and the blue is his current graph. He cooled the past by about a degree in order to create a non-existent warming trend.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
Recent Comments
- mwhite on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- Bob G on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on “Siberia might stay livable”
- Timo, not that one! on “Siberia might stay livable”
It would be interesting to graph the differences. You’d do a better job of that than me.
I wonder how minima appearing in the rural temps don’t happen to be minima in the city temps of the 1999 data
Hansen as clearly put a skew in this centered around the year 1980
Afaik, the Japan Meteorological Agency and its predecessors have records covering this period and going back much further.
Have the Hansen charts and their revisions been blessed by them?
While on the revision topic, was there ever a conclusion to the Reykjavik temperature adjustment debate?
Jim Hansen is the O J Simpson of climatology. He doesn’t have to answer for anything.
Any interested observer would note that during the time the US naval machinery in WWII got close to Japan in 1945, Tokyo (and most of the island) experienced by far the coldest year during the last Century.
This could be particularly observed few miles away from Tokyo
__at the west coast http://www.seatraining.de/H/Hi/hb-5.jpg , and
__at the east coast http://www.seatraining.de/H/Hi/hb-6.jpg
__and other locations as well.: http://www.seaclimate.com/h/images/buch/h_5.jpg
However, any one interested not to make James Hansen’s life and of his companions at IPCC etc too difficult, should not ask questions about the reasons for the extraordinary low temperatures throughout Japan just at the time when the Allies fought close to Japan’s shore., which is discussed here: http://www.seaclimate.com/h/h.html