Hansen pulled the same trick in Tokyo that he did in Phoenix. The black and white is his 1999 UHI adjusted graph, and the blue is his current graph. He cooled the past by about a degree in order to create a non-existent warming trend.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Greg in NZ on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- arn on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Trevor on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- czechlist on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- arn on COP29 Preview
- arn on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- stewartpid on COP29 Preview
It would be interesting to graph the differences. You’d do a better job of that than me.
I wonder how minima appearing in the rural temps don’t happen to be minima in the city temps of the 1999 data
Hansen as clearly put a skew in this centered around the year 1980
Afaik, the Japan Meteorological Agency and its predecessors have records covering this period and going back much further.
Have the Hansen charts and their revisions been blessed by them?
While on the revision topic, was there ever a conclusion to the Reykjavik temperature adjustment debate?
Jim Hansen is the O J Simpson of climatology. He doesn’t have to answer for anything.
Any interested observer would note that during the time the US naval machinery in WWII got close to Japan in 1945, Tokyo (and most of the island) experienced by far the coldest year during the last Century.
This could be particularly observed few miles away from Tokyo
__at the west coast http://www.seatraining.de/H/Hi/hb-5.jpg , and
__at the east coast http://www.seatraining.de/H/Hi/hb-6.jpg
__and other locations as well.: http://www.seaclimate.com/h/images/buch/h_5.jpg
However, any one interested not to make James Hansen’s life and of his companions at IPCC etc too difficult, should not ask questions about the reasons for the extraordinary low temperatures throughout Japan just at the time when the Allies fought close to Japan’s shore., which is discussed here: http://www.seaclimate.com/h/h.html