1972 Olympic Deja Vu

In 1972, the referee at the US/Russia  basketball match had his mind made up that Russia was going to beat the US.

Spokane Daily Chronicle – Google News Archive Search

We had a repeat yesterday in women’s soccer – with the referee determined to see the US beat Canada.

Canada took the lead three separate times through three Christine Sinclair goals of exponentially expanding skill. It was a triptych that ought to be hanging over a Flemish altar.

“We feel like we didn’t lose, we feel like it was taken from us,” Sinclair said. “It’s a shame in a game like that that was so important, the ref decided the result before it started.”

News, Toronto, GTA, Sports, Business, Entertainment, Canada, World, Breaking – thestar.com

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to 1972 Olympic Deja Vu

  1. Bob says:

    I watched that game in it’s entirety. As a biased Canadian I though Christine Sinclair produced the gritiest performance of give it your all and never give up that I have ever seen. And to think a woman has the biggest heart that sport has ever seen. The American team was superb but Christine is right, Canada was robbed. What a shame. But shame, it seems, is much a part of soccer.

    • She played well enough to star on a top flight men’s team.

      The US team should have just turned the ball over to Canada instead of taking the free kick. Their win was hollow.

  2. Sundance says:

    Lets hope the Canadians aren’t dehydrated in their next match from all that crying.

  3. Go Canucks! says:

    The US team plays the whistle. It’s the ref’s fault. Turning the ball over would be nice but sports is about winning. Plus who can make that decision in a fast moving game.

  4. Andy DC says:

    I hate it when refs rather than players decide any sports match. Even if my team beneftis, I get a hollow feeling about it.

  5. sunsettommy says:

    What about the stomping by a Canadian player that was never caught by the ref?

  6. Tom says:

    By premeditated I guess the sore losers mean that both the goalie and the coaches had been warned twice each that she was holding the ball too long? Maybe she could have just changed her behavior? Nahh, lets blame the evil Americans instead . . .

    http://news.ca.msn.com/top-stories/canada-us-soccer-ref-defended-by-father

    I agree Sinclair played a wonderful game and deserved better, but blaming the Americans, or the referee (who could have made the call twice earlier) is just sour grapes. I would have expected a little more class on this site, especially from the moderator.

    Huzzahs all around . . .

    • I mean making a harsh unnecessary Olympics gold medal changing call which is never made under any circumstances despite the fact that it is violated many times every single soccer match. It was absurd, premeditated and unwarranted

      • Tom says:

        Yeeahhhhh . . . . that’s it. . . . . It was a SETUP!. That’s the ticket . . . A SETUP I tell you . . .

      • Me says:

        Ya know for someone who loves the sport and want’s integrity in it, has a right to express his or her disgust in it. But fer Me, it’s mind over matter, I don’t mind because it really doesn’t matter to Me. It’s all another money racket now, and who gains from it, it’s not the people that loves the sport and wants integrity in it. Because if it was we wouldn’t see allot of so called sports in the Olympics being determined by a bunch of judges opinions and I’m not talking about Soccer with the judges opinion thinggy. It’s all Bull Shit, watch WWE wrastling, at least ya know that is fixed, you’d be retarded if ya didn’t know that, but enjoy it fer the entertainment value that’s no different that watching a soap opera, or some Sci-Fi flick or watching an Inconvenient Truth fer a good laugh every now and again.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *