They had a very short season in Greenland, where they only collected one microscopic ice cherry and had to wildly exaggerate its size. Now they have moved over to the Chukchi Sea where they hope to collect a few cherries right before winter hits.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
Recent Comments
- Luigi on 70C At Lisbon
- Bob G on Extreme Weather
- arn on 70C At Lisbon
- Gordon Vigurs on Extreme Weather
- pmc47025 on Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- Charles Higley on 70C At Lisbon
- Charles Higley on 70C At Lisbon
- Charles Higley on 70C At Lisbon
- dm on Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
Their new modus operandi is to ignore the climate and look at weather events. Remember the recent US heatwave? This is how they will continue even if global mean temps start heading south. No matter how cool the world gets they will blame climate disruptiveness – you can’t win an argument against any religion.
Speaking a bald cherry pickers from the west, or that went to college out west (Berkeley), get a load of the National Review’s headlined response to hockey stick fabricator Michael Mann suing them: http://www.nationalreview.com/
Nice!
When the entire Arctic region shows signs of warming and melting, it pretty much doesn’t matter what direction you go– you’re gonna find evidence of warming and melting. What gets harder and harder is for AGW “skeptics” to find any little cherries that show Earth’s energy balance hasn’t been tipped.
Most of us actually aren’t planetary hypochondriacs, difficult as that may be to believe.
Climate Chatterbot alert. Don’t bother or every thread will be highjacked.
Just to recap, I think you must mean this cherry:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jul/24/greenland-ice-sheet-thaw-nasa?newsfeed=true
which seemed to have quite some juice:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jul/25/greenland-glacier-bridge-destroyed-video?newsfeed=true
and overall, the melt on Greenland is at a record for any recorded year:
http://www.greenlandmelting.com/1/post/2012/08/2012-the-goliath-melting-year.html
Is this the “microscopic ice cherry” you meant?
Quick, run away from the beach. The tidal wave of meltwater is coming
Using corrupted data to “prove” fraudulent claims. Very clever!