Alarmists believe that a 0.5C change in temperature is monotonic, your fault, and will kill all life on earth (except possibly cockroaches) – but ice core data indicates that 0.5C is just noise. 12C swings happen on a regular basis and humans have survived several of these swings.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on “Siberia might stay livable”
- Timo, not that one! on “Siberia might stay livable”
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
Better buy some smelling salts for the alarmists… or not.
The scary thing about the graph is the short duration of the peaks and the long duration of the troughs.
Looks like we are overdue a trough. Better start pumping those greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere before it is too late!!
The climate must have stablized because of man made CO2.
look at the red line at the end of that graph.
then add the 2+°C, which basically all scientists agree we can t prevent any longer, to the blue line at the end.
you end up with a CO2 and a temperature maximum, over a 400000 year time span. wow, just wow.
Yes, CO2 has gone way up and temperature hasn’t. Try using you brain.
Sadly, I think he did.
why don t you point to the other part of the graph, which shows a basically vertical increase of CO2??
Are you completely daft? CO2 has shot way up, and temperature hasn’t. Use your brain.
Iibid.
What the hell is that? Vertical in terms of what? If you look at a graph showing the entire CO2 atmospheric concentration, you can’t see an include at all.
Daft isn’t even the word for it, I am still searching for an appropriate word that I could respectably use in a comment on this blog. still searching…
Incline .. I meant .. certainly nothing “vertical” .. my gosh…
look, i turned up the heat, but my room isn t hot already. curious, isn t it?
please take a look at what scientists have to say about the temperature increase caused by increased CO2. You will be surprised!
You evil energy abuser Son Of Daft! 😆
Interesting that SOB confuses CO2 with his furnace. Really scientific stuff, do tell…
stevengoddard says:
August 31, 2012 at 3:37 pm
Are you completely daft? CO2 has shot way up, and temperature hasn’t. Use your brain.
=====================================================
It’s global warming. No thinking required.
sod is a known troll. No brain, no thought, no eyes no balls
Son Of Daft! 😆
Wait till we get into the negative phase of the multidecadal atlantic oscillation. Arctic sea ice will go up and temperatures down again. CO2 will follow suit.
Sorta slow motion groundhog day…
Steve,
All you bike users see cycles in everything. 🙂