CRUTEM3v – August 1850. Phil had one thermometer record for the entire southern hemisphere, and was able to precisely calculate the hemispheric mean temperature anomaly of -1.182
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
Recent Comments
- mwhite on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- Bob G on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on “Siberia might stay livable”
- Timo, not that one! on “Siberia might stay livable”
It would be amusing to plot the subsequent global temperature using data from only the same grid squares as used in the 1850 plot.
Yeah but Steve Mosher says this is how science is done and he trusts the scientists.
Backed by someone esle that post here! 😆
Else, LMAO!
I fear they’ve developed DRB Syndrome (dirty rotten bastard).
Phil’s buddy Trenberth ran quickly from Stratwarm studies a few years ago and someone needs to ask him why?
This is the same dead-certain teleconnection approach used by the tree-ring fraudsters to estimate global or NH temperatures in centuries past based on a few bristle cone pines in one location in the US Southwest, and assuming stationarity of the relationship between ring width or density and temperature.
Its BAU ‘climate science.’ What’s the problem?
It shows up how poor a technique it is to average temperatures over a geographical area. The temperature of one place is that place’s temperature only. It can not be smeared across a region, as currently done by Hansen et al, to try and give the globe an average temperature, when using fewer and fewer weather stations.
The full file gives the 95% confidence range for the August 1850 figure as between +0.323 and -2.911C.
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/crutem3/diagnostics/hemispheric/southern/monthly
Stop being an idiot.
Confidence range to 3 sig figs… That makes this metmess even worse!
LOL!!!!
You might as well assert you are 95% confident you have no idea what the temperature was. 😉