For nine days, the Obama administration made a case that virtually everyone understood was untrue: that the killing of our ambassador and three other Americans in Benghazi, Libya, was a random, spontaneous act of individuals upset about an online video—an unpredictable attack on a well-protected compound that had nothing do to with the eleventh anniversary of 9/11.
These claims were wrong. Every one of them. But the White House pushed them hard
Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, appeared on five Sunday talk shows on September 16. A “hateful video” triggered a “spontaneous protest .??.??. outside of our consulate in Benghazi” that “spun from there into something much, much more violent,” she said on Face the Nation. “We do not have information at present that leads us to conclude that this was premeditated or preplanned.”
On This Week, Rice said the consulate was well secured. “The security personnel that the State Department thought were required were in place,” she said, adding: “We had substantial presence with our personnel and the consulate in Benghazi. Tragically two of the four Americans who were killed were there providing security. That was their function, and indeed there were many other colleagues who were doing the same with them.”
White House press secretary Jay Carney not only denied that the attacks had anything to do with the anniversary of 9/11 but scolded reporters who, citing the administration’s own pre-9/11 boasts about its security preparations for the anniversary, made the connection. “I think that you’re conveniently conflating two things,” Carney snapped, “which is the anniversary of 9/11 and the incidents that took place, which are under investigation.”
Wrong, wrong, wrong, and wrong. Intelligence officials understood immediately that the attacks took place on 9/11 for a reason. The ambassador, in a country that faces a growing al Qaeda threat, had virtually no security. The two contractors killed in the attacks were not part of the ambassador’s security detail, and there were not, in fact, “many other colleagues” working security with them.
This isn’t just a problem. It’s a scandal.
If this were the first time top Obama officials had tried to sell a bogus narrative after an attack, perhaps they would deserve the benefit of the doubt. It’s not.
On December 28, 2009, three days after Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab attempted to detonate explosives in his underwear aboard an airliner over Detroit, President Obama told the country that the incident was the work of “an isolated extremist.” It wasn’t.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
- Geoengineering To Save The Planet
- Geoengineering Genocide
- No Crime On Capitol Hill
Recent Comments
- dearieme on Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- Gamecock on “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Francis Barnett on Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- conrad ziefle on Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- Francis Barnett on Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Ed on An Inconvenient Truth
- mwhite on Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Robertvd on “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Robertvd on Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- arn on Climate Grifting Shutting Down
Obama can do or say anything he wants. The media has his back. They’ll get him reelected no matter what it takes.
You’ve got to crack a few eggs to make an omelette (Stalin)
1.In order to achieve something, it is inevitable and necessary that something should be destroyed
And better yet:
When we hang the capitalists they will sell us the rope!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD1Ae4wM85Y&feature=related
What president? I only see a con man in the White House.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/09/21/will-obama-succeed-in-creating-united-states-islam-in-middle-east/
I’ve read The Root of Obama’s Rages and watched Obama 2016 movie. Obviously, he’s trying to appease Muslims and help them form United States of Islam in the north Africa and Middle East. No different than what Carter did with Iran.
http://www.defense.gov/news/briefingslide.aspx?briefingslideid=22