Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- Jack the Insider on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Terry Shipman on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Earlier Than Usual”
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gamecock on “Earlier Than Usual”
2012 : McKibben Blamed The Lack Of Tornadoes On Global Warming
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
McCrybabbie just doing his job blaming everything on CO2. Having a pathetic media that supports him and low-information people getting their “information” from him makes it a pretty cool gig. Gee, where has that formula been repeated?
OT, but a good read:
And we should also ask, just how successful have we been at mitigation in the past.
“We drew upon scientific (evidence-based) forecasting principles to audit the forecasting procedures used to forecast global mean temperatures by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) –leg “1” of the stool. This audit found that the procedures violated 81% of the 89 relevant forecasting principles
We also did an audit of the forecasting procedures used for two papers that were designed to support proposed regulation related to protecting polar bears – leg “3” of the stool. On average, these procedures violated 85% of the 90 relevant principles.
The warming alarmists have not demonstrated the predictive validity of their procedures. Instead, their argument for predictive validity is based on their claim that nearly all scientists agree with the forecasts. Such an appeal to “voting” is contrary to the scientific method. It is also incorrect.
We conducted a validation test of the IPCC forecasts based on the assumption that there would be no interventions. This test found that the errors for IPCC model long-term forecasts (91 to 100 years in the future) were 12.6 times larger than those from an evidence-based “no change” model.
Based on our analyses, we concluded that the global warming alarm is an anti-scientific political movement.
We then turned to the “structured analogies” method to forecast the likely outcomes of this movement. In this ongoing study, we have, to date, identified 26 historical alarmist movements. None of the forecasts for the analogous alarms proved correct. In the 25 alarms that called for government intervention, the government impost regulations in 23. None of the 23 interventions was effective and harm was caused by 20 of them.”
http://science.house.gov/sites/republicans.science.house.gov/files/documents/hearings/Report%20for%20Congressional%20hearing-R14%20%282%29%20armstrong%20update.pdf
There aren’t many blokes I wouldn’t choose to go for a beer with but McKibben, Schmidt, Mann, Trenberth, et Al Gore are some of them.
I hope the environmental alarmists solve the mystery of how it was possible for a tornado to materialize in an area named “Tornado Alley”. Maybe more research money would help them figure it out? 😉
Since 2011 had too many tornado deaths and 2012 had too few, does McKibben think 2013 is “just right”? Of course not. As long as you have greedy Republican males, the weather can never be right.
He’s leading the troll brigade from behind. Feading them the most bizar facts and links.
Meanwhile he lies about not getting paid by these environmental groups he represents.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/02/15/bill-mckibben-is-not-what-he-seems-to-be-i-catch-him-in-a-lie/
He is a useful idiot that would be discarded as one of the first if the alarmists would win, but since that wil not be the case, I rather call him an annoying pop-up that will get blocked any time soon when the scam is over and proper reporting is restored.
If stupidity were worth money, McKibben would be right up there with Bill Gates.
That Blowhard McKnutjob is coming Downunder shortly in June on another one of his Global Warming BS promoting tours.
Do the Maths Tour:
http://www.eventfinder.co.nz/2013/bill-mckibben-do-the-maths-tour/wellington
Well I’ve done the maths his Global trotting along with Al Gores on promoting AGW/CC BS waffling a load of Hot Air.. Those 2 hypocrites sure have large carbon footprints.