Obama Plans to Make Statement on IRS Scandal
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Dayna on Seventeen Years Of Fun
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- arn on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
He can announce he’s not a crook all he likes but the sane half of America ain’t buying it.
Announced the resignation of someone who was already slated to leave next month anyway. Big fat zero.
Maybe he should announce that he isn’t a flute player, either. Reggie could vouch for him… and carry his breath mints. 🙂
😉 😉
The Dolt who just keeps on giving….
Hopefully, I added this correctly….
okay, maybe not… Here’s the link…
http://landing.newsinc.com/shared/video.html?freewheel=91074&sitesection=breitbartprivate&VID=24822575
http://washingtonexaminer.com/tim-carney-the-irs-is-deeply-political-and-very-democratic/article/2529758?custom_click=rss
“In the past three election cycles, the Center for Responsive Politics’ database shows about $474,000 in political donations by individuals listing “IRS” or “Internal Revenue Service” as their employer.
This money heavily favors Democrats: $247,000 to $145,000, with the rest going to political action committees. (Oddly, half of those GOP donations come from only two IRS employees, one in Houston and one in Annandale, Va.)
IRS employees also gave $67,000 to the PAC of the National Treasury Employees Union, which in turn gave more than 96 percent of its contributions to Democrats. Add the PAC cash to the individual donations and IRS employees favor Democrats 2-to-1.
The Cincinnati office where the political targeting took place is much more partisan, judging by FEC filings. More than 75 percent of the campaign contributions from that office in the past three elections went to Democrats. In 2012, every donation traceable to employees at that office went to either President Obama or liberal Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio.”
Saw this headline on Drudge, and thought they were referring to Holder…
“Dem Rep Brings Crying Baby to Hearing…”
How do such uninformed people get into such positions of power…
http://www.buzzfeed.com/dorsey/eric-holder-just-doesnt-know
White House releases email, but three days worth are missing…
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/05/15/white-house-releases-benghazi-emails-see-them-here/
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/05/16/obama-to-meet-with-treasury-officials-over-irs-scandal/
Anyone see Obama deflect a question from the Bloomberg reporter today at the press conference with PM Erdogan?
Obama was asked if anyone at the White House knew about the targeting of conservative groups before the White House Counsel was informed just a few days ago.
Obama answered, “I certainly did not know anything about the IG report before the IG report was leaked to the press,” without addressing the actual question of whether any of his political appointees in the White House were aware that the IRS was playing political favorites. All he said was that he personally did not know about the IG report. This leaves open the possibility that others in the White House knew or directed the IRS to target conservative groups, and that he knew about the activity before the IG report came out.
He could not say that no one in the White House knew, because he would be caught later in a lie. Is this Clintonian, or Nixonian?