Arctic ice area is the highest for the date since at least 2002
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- arn on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- Bob G on CO2²
- Bob G on CO2²
- conrad ziefle on CO2²
- arn on CO2²
Be on guard! This is when the AGW scientists will usually try to delay or change the ice graphs. A normal or higher anomaly for NH is unacceptable to them, it would really wreck it (AGW) much quicker than its supposed to. They are belatedly admitting defeat but very slowly as they look for new jobs LOL
Steven, can we get a real average of all satellite Arctic ice data? I so tire of the odd 27 year ‘average’.
The standard logic for the cold start to this year according to many national meteorological offices is that the exceptional loss of ice at the Arctic has caused this. But as far as I can see the Arctic ice currently is the same as in 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 (+/- not much) and it was not this cold across so much of the NH then.
So ice loss causes ice gain.
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
It must be 🙂