Operation Smear Benghazi Whistleblowers
It’s on. As the White House grapples with a growing backlash over its Libya lies and lapses, President Obama’s apologists are gearing up for battle. Put on your hip-waders. Grab those tar buckets. Get ready for Operation Smear Benghazi Whistleblowers.
Capitol Hill hearings this Wednesday on the deadly 9/11 consulate attack by jihadists will feature three compelling witnesses, all State Department veterans: Gregory N. Hicks, deputy chief of mission at the U.S. Embassy in Libya and highest-ranking U.S. diplomat in the country at the time of the Benghazi jihad attacks; Mark I. Thompson, a former Marine who now serves as deputy coordinator for operations in the agency’s Counterterrorism Bureau; and Eric Nordstrom, a diplomatic security officer who was the top security officer in Libya.
Nordstrom first testified last fall about how State Department brass spurned his requests for increased security at the compound. Hicks and Thompson are coming forward publicly for the first time this week with more damning evidence contradicting Team Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s claims about the administration’s response the night of the attack and in the ensuing months of cover-ups.
According to the House Oversight Committee, Hicks reportedly will refute Team Obama’s claims that nobody was told to stand down and that all military resources available were used in the rescue efforts. As Special Forces prepared to fly from Tripoli to Benghazi to save lives during the attacks, Hicks says the team received a phone call from the U.S. Special Operations Command Africa telling them “you can’t go” and that the decision was “purely political.”
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
Recent Comments
- arn on Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- Francis Barnett on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on 100% Wind By 2030
- mwhite on 100% Wind By 2030
- dearieme on 100% Wind By 2030
- DABA13 on 100% Wind By 2030
- Gamecock on 100% Wind By 2030
- gordon vigurs on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on 100% Wind By 2030
- gordon vigurs on 100% Wind By 2030
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.
It’s nauseating to watch these crooks play politics and not trying to get to the truth. The democrats don’t care about the truth but are defending the administration.
Good. The entire Democratic Party is going to be exposed as the treasonous criminals which they are.
Watch the news tonight and see how many cover it. I doubt it will even get a blurb except on Fox, which is why they hate Fox. This is serious stuff, way more serious than Watergate and these despicable people are walking over the dead to protect their politics. Sickening.
I guess it must be sex tapes featuring Columbian hookers that keeps the Secret Service detail from defecting.
The whistleblowers have legal protection under the federal whistleblower protection act.
Unfortunately, that law depends on 0bama appointees for enforcement, and the 0bama-media for public accountability.
So, these sheep are going public, with only the wolves to protect them.
Global warming finishes last again! 😆
http://www.people-press.org/2013/01/24/deficit-reduction-rises-on-publics-agenda-for-obamas-second-term/
This democrat woman is acting like a defense attorney trying to trip up the witnesses. Disgusting.
What I don’t get is why don’t they just tell a plausible story closer to the truth…it was terrorists, it was a trap, we wanted to avoid massive “collateral damage”, whatever…people die in war, especially on covert CIA missions.
People will accept whatever the Regime says, no matter the cogitative dissonance, and then forget about it. Covering it up just drags it out…unless they want to keep it around for a diversion??