Operation Smear Benghazi Whistleblowers
It’s on. As the White House grapples with a growing backlash over its Libya lies and lapses, President Obama’s apologists are gearing up for battle. Put on your hip-waders. Grab those tar buckets. Get ready for Operation Smear Benghazi Whistleblowers.
Capitol Hill hearings this Wednesday on the deadly 9/11 consulate attack by jihadists will feature three compelling witnesses, all State Department veterans: Gregory N. Hicks, deputy chief of mission at the U.S. Embassy in Libya and highest-ranking U.S. diplomat in the country at the time of the Benghazi jihad attacks; Mark I. Thompson, a former Marine who now serves as deputy coordinator for operations in the agency’s Counterterrorism Bureau; and Eric Nordstrom, a diplomatic security officer who was the top security officer in Libya.
Nordstrom first testified last fall about how State Department brass spurned his requests for increased security at the compound. Hicks and Thompson are coming forward publicly for the first time this week with more damning evidence contradicting Team Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s claims about the administration’s response the night of the attack and in the ensuing months of cover-ups.
According to the House Oversight Committee, Hicks reportedly will refute Team Obama’s claims that nobody was told to stand down and that all military resources available were used in the rescue efforts. As Special Forces prepared to fly from Tripoli to Benghazi to save lives during the attacks, Hicks says the team received a phone call from the U.S. Special Operations Command Africa telling them “you can’t go” and that the decision was “purely political.”
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
Recent Comments
- dm on The Clean Energy Boom
- arn on Up Is Down
- Bob G on Up Is Down
- arn on Climate Change In Spain
- conrad ziefle on The Clock Is Ticking
- conrad ziefle on Climate Change In Spain
- conrad ziefle on Climate Change In Spain
- conrad ziefle on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- arn on The Clock Is Ticking
- Mike Peinsipp on The Clock Is Ticking
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.
It’s nauseating to watch these crooks play politics and not trying to get to the truth. The democrats don’t care about the truth but are defending the administration.
Good. The entire Democratic Party is going to be exposed as the treasonous criminals which they are.
Watch the news tonight and see how many cover it. I doubt it will even get a blurb except on Fox, which is why they hate Fox. This is serious stuff, way more serious than Watergate and these despicable people are walking over the dead to protect their politics. Sickening.
I guess it must be sex tapes featuring Columbian hookers that keeps the Secret Service detail from defecting.
The whistleblowers have legal protection under the federal whistleblower protection act.
Unfortunately, that law depends on 0bama appointees for enforcement, and the 0bama-media for public accountability.
So, these sheep are going public, with only the wolves to protect them.
Global warming finishes last again! 😆
http://www.people-press.org/2013/01/24/deficit-reduction-rises-on-publics-agenda-for-obamas-second-term/
This democrat woman is acting like a defense attorney trying to trip up the witnesses. Disgusting.
What I don’t get is why don’t they just tell a plausible story closer to the truth…it was terrorists, it was a trap, we wanted to avoid massive “collateral damage”, whatever…people die in war, especially on covert CIA missions.
People will accept whatever the Regime says, no matter the cogitative dissonance, and then forget about it. Covering it up just drags it out…unless they want to keep it around for a diversion??