“Since 1998, the warmest year of the twentieth century, temperatures have not kept up with computer models that seemed to project steady warming; they’re perilously close to falling beneath even the lowest projections”.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
- Useful Graphs From ChatGPT
- Fort Lauderdale Drowning
- Sinking Of The Titanic
- Expert Arctic Forecasting
- Sinking Of The Titanic
- Nobel Prize Winning Forecast
- Changing Climate
- Gen Z Math And Solutions
- Orwellian NASA Maps
- Faking US Temperature Data
Recent Comments
- oeman50 on Adult Content On X
- arn on Adult Content On X
- Bob G on Adult Content On X
- John B on Adult Content On X
- Bob G on Adult Content On X
- Bob G on Adult Content On X
- arn on Adult Content On X
- conrad ziefle on Adult Content On X
- conrad ziefle on Adult Content On X
- James on Faking US Temperature Data
“Since 1998, the warmest year of the twentieth century, temperatures have not kept up with computer models that SEEMED [???] to project steady warming; they’re perilously close to falling beneath even the lowest projections”.
“1998…the warmest year of the twentieth century…???” Check out 1936! (e.g., http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/02/25/1936-the-most-extreme-temperatures-in-us-history/ )
And…”Seemed?” “SEEMED!??” Have these writers not seen the recent figure comparing the 5-year running average of 73 models? (e.g., http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/06/11/climate-models-achieve-six-sigma-failure-rates/ ) “Their” models show a steady rise from 1979 until today. “Seemed???” Good gravy!
And also, “…they’re [observed temperatures] perilously close to falling beneath even the lowest projections…” Sorry, y’all (do you writers not know anything about science?) …observed temperatures never have borne any co-relation to those predicted by models, since the divergence begins in 1979 and continues to this day.
To the writer…don’t give up your day job. Oh, wait…
You are absolutely correct. The Highest recorded temperatures in the Continental US were in the 1930’s. These temperaturwed have never been equaled since.
liars…..temps are way below the lowest projection
…but then that’s because all of a sudden the oceans decided to start hiding it
when it never did that before
if it’s hiding in the ocean….why did temps rise before
And $48 billion in govt subsidies the past 2 years has done squat to curb GHG emissions, let alone AGW: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06/21/study-govt-losing-billions-on-inefficient-tax-subsidies-that-dont-curb-climate/
See pp. 152-156 of the report for details. Theoretically, only higher fossil fuel taxes will work. The report is agnostic on this, not supporting or opposing this policy, just saying what their analysis suggests.
These experts need to do their homework. As Dr. Svalgard and others have pointed out, the earth has been steadily cooling for the past 3,000-plus years. We are now approaching the end of the current interglacial (the Holocene epoch), which has lasted more than 11,500 years. The globe will experience intermittent cold and warm periods as we approach the next glaciation, but overall the planet continues to cool.
The fictional tale of CO2-induced global warming is the product of manipulated climate models. There is no empirical or observational evidence to support such a conclusion. And the human portion of CO2 added to the atmosphere is so small compared to natural CO2 emissions (e.g. ocean outgassing, decaying vegetation and volcanism) that it cannot be measured.