“Since 1998, the warmest year of the twentieth century, temperatures have not kept up with computer models that seemed to project steady warming; they’re perilously close to falling beneath even the lowest projections”.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
Recent Comments
- Greg in NZ on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- arn on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Trevor on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- czechlist on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- arn on COP29 Preview
- arn on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- stewartpid on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on A Giant Eyesore
“Since 1998, the warmest year of the twentieth century, temperatures have not kept up with computer models that SEEMED [???] to project steady warming; they’re perilously close to falling beneath even the lowest projections”.
“1998…the warmest year of the twentieth century…???” Check out 1936! (e.g., http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/02/25/1936-the-most-extreme-temperatures-in-us-history/ )
And…”Seemed?” “SEEMED!??” Have these writers not seen the recent figure comparing the 5-year running average of 73 models? (e.g., http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/06/11/climate-models-achieve-six-sigma-failure-rates/ ) “Their” models show a steady rise from 1979 until today. “Seemed???” Good gravy!
And also, “…they’re [observed temperatures] perilously close to falling beneath even the lowest projections…” Sorry, y’all (do you writers not know anything about science?) …observed temperatures never have borne any co-relation to those predicted by models, since the divergence begins in 1979 and continues to this day.
To the writer…don’t give up your day job. Oh, wait…
You are absolutely correct. The Highest recorded temperatures in the Continental US were in the 1930’s. These temperaturwed have never been equaled since.
liars…..temps are way below the lowest projection
…but then that’s because all of a sudden the oceans decided to start hiding it
when it never did that before
if it’s hiding in the ocean….why did temps rise before
And $48 billion in govt subsidies the past 2 years has done squat to curb GHG emissions, let alone AGW: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06/21/study-govt-losing-billions-on-inefficient-tax-subsidies-that-dont-curb-climate/
See pp. 152-156 of the report for details. Theoretically, only higher fossil fuel taxes will work. The report is agnostic on this, not supporting or opposing this policy, just saying what their analysis suggests.
These experts need to do their homework. As Dr. Svalgard and others have pointed out, the earth has been steadily cooling for the past 3,000-plus years. We are now approaching the end of the current interglacial (the Holocene epoch), which has lasted more than 11,500 years. The globe will experience intermittent cold and warm periods as we approach the next glaciation, but overall the planet continues to cool.
The fictional tale of CO2-induced global warming is the product of manipulated climate models. There is no empirical or observational evidence to support such a conclusion. And the human portion of CO2 added to the atmosphere is so small compared to natural CO2 emissions (e.g. ocean outgassing, decaying vegetation and volcanism) that it cannot be measured.