“Since 1998, the warmest year of the twentieth century, temperatures have not kept up with computer models that seemed to project steady warming; they’re perilously close to falling beneath even the lowest projections”.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Posting On X
- conrad ziefle on The Importance Of Good Tools
- conrad ziefle on Posting On X
- conrad ziefle on Posting On X
- Disillusioned on The Importance Of Good Tools
- conrad ziefle on Climate Scamming For Profit
- John Francis on Climate Scamming For Profit
- conrad ziefle on The Importance Of Good Tools
- conrad ziefle on The Importance Of Good Tools
- Bob G on The Importance Of Good Tools
“Since 1998, the warmest year of the twentieth century, temperatures have not kept up with computer models that SEEMED [???] to project steady warming; they’re perilously close to falling beneath even the lowest projections”.
“1998…the warmest year of the twentieth century…???” Check out 1936! (e.g., http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/02/25/1936-the-most-extreme-temperatures-in-us-history/ )
And…”Seemed?” “SEEMED!??” Have these writers not seen the recent figure comparing the 5-year running average of 73 models? (e.g., http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/06/11/climate-models-achieve-six-sigma-failure-rates/ ) “Their” models show a steady rise from 1979 until today. “Seemed???” Good gravy!
And also, “…they’re [observed temperatures] perilously close to falling beneath even the lowest projections…” Sorry, y’all (do you writers not know anything about science?) …observed temperatures never have borne any co-relation to those predicted by models, since the divergence begins in 1979 and continues to this day.
To the writer…don’t give up your day job. Oh, wait…
You are absolutely correct. The Highest recorded temperatures in the Continental US were in the 1930’s. These temperaturwed have never been equaled since.
liars…..temps are way below the lowest projection
…but then that’s because all of a sudden the oceans decided to start hiding it
when it never did that before
if it’s hiding in the ocean….why did temps rise before
And $48 billion in govt subsidies the past 2 years has done squat to curb GHG emissions, let alone AGW: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06/21/study-govt-losing-billions-on-inefficient-tax-subsidies-that-dont-curb-climate/
See pp. 152-156 of the report for details. Theoretically, only higher fossil fuel taxes will work. The report is agnostic on this, not supporting or opposing this policy, just saying what their analysis suggests.
These experts need to do their homework. As Dr. Svalgard and others have pointed out, the earth has been steadily cooling for the past 3,000-plus years. We are now approaching the end of the current interglacial (the Holocene epoch), which has lasted more than 11,500 years. The globe will experience intermittent cold and warm periods as we approach the next glaciation, but overall the planet continues to cool.
The fictional tale of CO2-induced global warming is the product of manipulated climate models. There is no empirical or observational evidence to support such a conclusion. And the human portion of CO2 added to the atmosphere is so small compared to natural CO2 emissions (e.g. ocean outgassing, decaying vegetation and volcanism) that it cannot be measured.