Global warming appears to have slowed lately. That’s no reason to celebrate.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- conrad ziefle on “pushing nature past its limits”
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- John Francis on Mission Accomplished
- Mike on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Timo, not that one! on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Bill on Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Gamecock on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Gamecock on “pushing nature past its limits”
- William on Mission Accomplished
Bobby has a permanent list to port and should be put onto dry dock for repairs. That’s why he sees a slope in everything that’s flat. What a weird chap!
IF we get hit by a giant asteroid this COULD leave the world’s military potentially defenceless which would make us rife for a POSSIBLE alien invasion.
See I play this game well too. 🙂
NASA agrees with Bobby. Antarctic Ice is breaking up catastrophically. Maybe Hansen has a fembot in NASA still issuing PR statements even though he is homeless these days.
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/earth20130613.html
The strategy of the alarmist priests is to have so many talking points out there, that the realists can never hope to present evidence against all. When Antarctic ice is covering an enormous area, then the ice on the land mass is thinning. When the Arctic ice extent is expanding over previous years, then it’s much thinner and volume is down. When this excuse looks doubtful, then permafrost melting is suggested. Then ocean acidification, then…then…then…
If .0001 additional warming suddenly releases quadrillions of gigatons of something into the atmosphere, things will get pretty dicey…. or slicey, or spicey, not sure.
or nicey 🙂
We just repeated the cyclical events of 1918-1941, so a method of predicting the future is best achieved using the past, as a reference.
Bobby hasn’t looked at history thoroughly enough, which does fit the AGW mode of operation.
Upper tropospheric interactions and particle mixing along with the 10,000 X drier than Sahara mesospheric digestion is indeed a filter between EMF’s of all wavelengths coming from below ( the Troposphere & Stratosphere) and the varying regions above. We found out 7 months ago that the Van Allen belts can come in flavors of three or more and have no measurements of the rarified matter within the upper magnetosphere, much less the regions from -30m below our surface all the way up to 9 Re in space.
Most Climatologists are low IQ individuals with an egotistical twist that does not suit mankind well!
Trying to understand the ability of mixed C02 with the other 99.586% of tropospheric constituents to influence the planets heat content is similar to a moron on a mission to waste my $.
Most ACADEMICS today–not just climate scientists–are low IQ individuals with an egotistical twist (towards non-academics).
“….all sorts of unpredictable effects.” Unpredictable are the worst kind. Be afraid, be very afraid.
If we do nothing there are all sorts of unpredicable effects, but even if we take all the man made CO2 out of the atmosphere, there will still be all sorts of unpredicable effects. Perhaps an Ice Age. Those have taken place several times in the past, long before humanity became a factor. Another Ice Age would do far more harm to human civilization than a few degrees of warming.
Why not celebrate? Here is the Warmist brain in action. Only bad climate / bad weather is worth celebrating. It’s the hidden agenda really. 🙁
They are recycling, recycling, recycling. Same old crap over and over. They never give up.
It’s like a herpes infection. You have to kill the host to get rid of the disease.
http://www.latimes.com/news/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-southern-california-snow-20130614,0,1562365.story
But in this case, Ron, the host is… OS!!!
Ha ha ha…..,
Bobby is much taken with the unverified climate temperature modeling projections along with the never observed positive feedbacks to melt the world.
It is this stupid tripe is why I get cynical about their brain health and their obvious loony leftist greenie philosophy.
Permafrost is a non-problem:
Long-term warming restructures Arctic tundra without changing net soil carbon storage
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature12129.html
Are Siberian swamps a global threat?
http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20050822/41201605-print.html
And…
is http://www.appinsys.com/globalwarming/AMO.htm . Not CO2.
Thanks for the headline idea! Got the WaPo story “greened” over at fark.com. “Global warming may ‘appear’ to have ‘slowed’ for only 15 years, but EVERYONE STILL NEEDS TO PANIC, and we really really mean it this time, for reals. Hello? Anyone?”
As with most agw threads at fark, the comments are a lot of fun to read, enjoy: http://www.fark.com/comments/7798939/Global-warming-may-appear-to-have-slowed-for-only-15-years-but-EVERYONE-STILL-NEEDS-TO-PANIC-we-really-really-mean-it-this-time-for-reals-Hello-Anyone?startid=84825680
Gosh this appears to be straight from the lunatic asylum!
So much ignorance there that I wonder if they are ressurected leftists from the old USSR.
They use all kinds of “evidence” that predate the 1880’s such as this: http://www.fark.com/comments/7798939/84827389#c84827389
When we know that the IPCC considers 1970 onward as the time frame that is most relevant to the AGW conjecture.