Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
- The Origins Of Modern Climate Science
- If An Academic Said It, It Must Be True
- Record Snow Cover
- Stopping Climate Misinformation
- Arctic Ice Free In Two Years
- “Decades Of Scientific Research”
- The Atlantic : Tesla Bombings Not Politics Or Terrorism
Recent Comments
- arn on “what the science shows”
- Bob G on Causes Of Earthquakes
- Bob G on “what the science shows”
- conrad ziefle on On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Tel on “what the science shows”
- Solar Mutant Ninjaneer on On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- conrad ziefle on On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- conrad ziefle on Precision Taxation
- conrad ziefle on Causes Of Earthquakes
- conrad ziefle on “what the science shows”
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
If you’re giving yourself everything from drought to “increased precipitation,” which is basically every possible condition under the sun it’s hard for me personally to be impressed with your consistency.
“Twenty-seven vehicles slammed into each other during a sandstorm that blinded drivers on Interstate 80 in rural northern Nevada, killing a truck driver, seriously injuring several other people and sapping already thin emergency resources, officials said.”
http://news.yahoo.com/1-man-dead-27-car-nevada-sandstorm-pileup-181920988.html
McFibben’s alarmist tweet in 3…2…1…
They have signs posted to watch for dust along that stretch of freeway as that is as common as fog here is E TN!
Oh the hits (and nuts) just keep on coming! From Iceagenow.com…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_hcz0NwtU7Q
http://iceagenow.info/2013/06/delegate-global-warming-means-longer-colder-winters/
The interviewee is from the Cook Islands, which experiences a tropical climate. From the “travel online” website:
“Located right in the heart of the South Pacific Ocean, the Cook Islands enjoy a beauiful warm, tropical climate all year round.The months from May to October are slightly cooler and experience temperatures ranging from 22 – 27°C while in the warmer months from November to April temperatures reach 26 – 30°C with more humidity. Most of the rainfall occurs over the warmer Summer months in the form of storms in the afternoons.”
It is perhaps not surprising that she just can’t comprehend the normal weather variability we experience in Europe. It is difficult to argue against such mind-blowing ignorance.
Also, for some people, the term”global warming” has become synonymous with “climate change”, so whether it is actually warming becomes irrelevant.
Ok, so… how do you have “greater extremes?” Is that like extremely extreme?
Obviously, severe drought means flooding in the same way global warming can cause blizzards.
As if you never had droughts and floods in the Midwest before.
Missouri counts as part of the Ohio Valley region.
According to NOAA’s climate extremes index, rainfall variability has been much reduced in recent years, i.e. less droughts and also less extreme wet years.
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/extremes/cei/graph/ce/3/01-12
RE: Jesse Worker – “greater extremes”
If Jesse’s talking point were true, the extreme maximum temperature record would not be 100 years old.
Due to asserted increasing variability ie hotter/colder, wetter/drier that record would have fallen long ago.