The graph below shows how misleading Muller’s data set is post 1980
Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs
Let’s lose the post-1980 hockey stick, and do a more meaningful merge. No net global warming for 75 years.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- AI Doublespeak
- Net Zero Intelligence
- “The Green Party dropped nearly 9 per cent”
- Fake Record Heat In India
- RFK Jr’s Plan For $12 Gas
- Hockey Match
- Hockey Match
- Giving Proper Credit
- Conspiracy Theory!
- “No One Is Above The Law”
- CNN Experts Discuss Medicine
- Looking For Their Lost Keys
- Rapid Climate Change
- CBS News 1982 : One Fourth Of Florida To Drown
- Affordable Transportation
- “Why Scientific Fraud Is Suddenly Everywhere”
- She Hates Her State
- Climate Friendly War
- Office Of Climate Change And Health Equity And Environmental Justice
- “100% Non-Carbon By 2030”
- 1991 : United Nations Calls For Genocide
- Mainstream Fascism In Academia
- California Finds A New Way To Drive Businesses Out
- Powerful Climate Mathematics
- NY Times – Cameras Are Racist
Recent Comments
- Denis Rushworth on Net Zero Intelligence
- Disillusioned on AI Doublespeak
- arn on AI Doublespeak
- William on AI Doublespeak
- William on AI Doublespeak
- William on AI Doublespeak
- William on AI Doublespeak
- Gordon Vigurs on AI Doublespeak
- Jack the Insider on AI Doublespeak
- Chris on AI Doublespeak
When all the feedback effects set in from nothing happening, nothing will happen. Just you wait!
Science and general historians will look back to this time and wonder, “How could they–the whole civilized world–take their ‘global temperature’ measurements so seriously, especially when they flew in the face of the well-confirmed Standard Atmosphere, with its stable surface temperature?”
Yeah but, Steve Mosher says SAT is golden, and BEST is best.
The first graph is actually very damaging if you believe alarmist/sceptic/alarmist/skeptic/alarmist Muller’s BEST data is accurate. It shows that the troposphere is warming much more slowly than the surface. As we all know from the climate experts, water vapor feedback will cause the troposphere to warm at a different rate than the surface. This key signature is proof of CACC.
The graph demonstrates that water vapor feedback is strongly negative.
🙂
Your splicing looks silly but that is what climate scientists do!
Your second diagram is exactly what they do with sea level data.
What do you expect from a guy who lies about being a skeptic?