Consensus Of Washington Post Readers Want To Power The US By Cold Fusion

After four weeks of the first Wonkblog CrowdSourced, there is a consensus! Asked to explain what you view as the most promising energy source for America’s economic and environmental future, you favored one answer, heavily, above the others: Low energy nuclear reactions, or cold fusion.

CrowdSourced: Wonkblog readers are really excited about cold fusion

Personally I prefer a mixture of windmills, solar panels, tofu and pixie dust.

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Consensus Of Washington Post Readers Want To Power The US By Cold Fusion

  1. philjourdan says:

    Definitely Pixie dust!

    What’s their next poll? WHat income group do you want to be in, poor, middle or rich?”

    I guess they are taking lessons from government studies.

  2. KevinK says:

    I’m going with Rich and a Pixie Dust mine. It’s the old belt AND suspenders mindset.

    KevinK

  3. Unicorn Farts–the only way to fly.

  4. The Iconoclast says:

    Wishful thinking and unicorn tears!

  5. Jimbo says:

    Our future energy needs is not going to be a problem We have nuclear, shale gas, coal and whatever new technology / better techniques for the rest of this century. I sleep well at nights.

    • Eric Simpson says:

      But the UK is not doing so well.
      Having adopted a climate program similar to what the US House passed in 2009, the UK is at just the very beginning and super easy part of a 40 year trip into energy and economic oblivion. Maybe it’s poetic justice and self-loathing for their centuries of imperialism, and now they will become an international pygmy.

      Anyway, the news:
      (Reuters) – Britain’s risk of electricity blackouts by 2015 is more serious than previously thought, regulator Ofgem warned on Thursday.
      The country’s spare electricity supply margin could fall as low as 2 percent in 2015/16, down from around 14 percent currently. Last year Ofgem gave an estimate of 4 percent.
      “Electricity supplies are set to tighten faster than previously expected in the middle of this decade,” Ofgem said in a report, adding that the chance of supply disruptions would rise to one in 12 years in 2015/16 from one in 47 years now.
      Britain has seen a vast number of power plants close and being mothballed due to emissions-reduction policies and the loss-making economics of gas-fired power plants.

  6. slimething says:

    That’s a perfectly logical reason to kill coal and oil

    sarc/off

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *