Global warming appears to have slowed lately. That’s no reason to celebrate.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Fifteen Year Old Children In Australia Control The Weather
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Francis Barnett on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- Billyjack on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- conrad ziefle on “pushing nature past its limits”
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
I’ll get my oceanic and atmospheric info from NOAA. NASA should mind there own business.
NOAA is almost worse than NASA! If you want propaganda about CAGW NOAA is the best source!
In the old days, lying pieces of shit got strangled or worse!
CO2 oven roaster works on this principle, and the chicken tastes great!
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g43/DerekJohn_photos/stuff/6a00d834519c3c69e200e553d605cf8834-.jpg
SHH! Don’t tell them as you are infringing on their patent by using that! I keep mine hidden so no one can find out I have one. I also tapped into Hansen’s pipeline for my Winter Heating, but do not let that out either! 😉 😉
😆
That’s why dry ice burns when you touch it. – duh
Just above that guy in the comments:
stanlippmann says:
8:06 AM PDT
AGW has never been anything but a genocidal fraud, started by Sven Aarhenius, president of the Swedish Eugenics Society. Doubling CO2 will do nothing to the temperature since the CO2 band already totally absorbs radiation in the 10 micron band. The so-called “climate scientists” are nothing but pid stooges. Anyone still pushing this fraud is a war criminal an needs to be brought to justice at a new War Crimes Tribunal …
That include politicians and yellow journolists still pushing this BS. All of the climate models have failed, so they have already been proven worthless. It’s all about killing off most of the human race by convincing people to not have children, thinking there is no future….
So I had to look that up. Sure enough Arrhenius was the President and founder of the Swedish Society for Racial Hygiene. {You’ll have to squint to find the section on Svante being a card carrying bigot who invented the science of bigotry. It’s tiny indeed. Wikified tiny.}
Also Arrhenius was instrumental in setting up the the artificies of the Nobel Prize committee, and used his outsized influence from it’s inception until the day he died to award the medal on his friends and ban the prize from his enemies.
Explains alot about Al Gore don it?
Racial hygiene – sounds like they’re giving out tips on brushing your teeth or something.
I looked up the Society for Racial Hygiene and I found this tid bit of info – made me forget aoub the rest of it.
In Sweden the eugenics program continued until 1975. http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/1999/03/euge-19m.html
WTF?
Outstanding logic fail. It includes both the ad hominem (Arrhenius was a racist who believed in eugenics, Arrhenius was crooked – both horrific characteristics but not part of the argument), and red herring (Arrehenius exerted influence to award/deny Nobel Prizes to his friends/enemies).
Oh, you mean me?
Dude, I’m only as smart as the wikipedia, and there are the links.
Like I invented the creep.
Dipshit.
Obviously low in reading comprehension as well as argumentation. I didn’t say your statements were false, only that they have nothing to do with the topic under discussion.
Rob, you still haven’t shown that what Wiki states is wrong. Wanna try that instead of attacking the man??
Then you can go after the weak follow ons.
Of course, the sun produces very little longwave radiation, that is, radiation with wavelength > 4000 nm so the tweet is actually correct.
What utter BS – are you claiming that the Sun DIDN’T cause the heating that is responsible for all the radiation initially ??
How do you explain the fact that radiation is caused by the temperature of objects and that at such tiny amounts GHGs ould need to be on fire to emit anything like the amount of DLR claimed.
Did you not notice the unit kg in the definition of a joule ??
kg.m^2/s^2.
Energy does not spontaneously generate.
Not a lot is needed to be hundreds of times the sun’s flux at longwave wavelengths. That’s how the distinction is made when DLR is measured. Of course the original source of the energy in the DLR is the sun.
I’m sure there’s some point to elaborating on the fact that [E]=[M][L]^2[T]^-2 but it’s completely irrelevant here. Energy doesn’t spontaneously generate? With that and your definition of the SI unit of energy, we can at least agree on something. But what’s your point?
Interesting, not sure of the exact numbers, but assuming this is true, it is really deceptive spin (technically correct yet completely out of context) on the part of author “CarbonPollution.”
And I would wonder how much of the Sun’s longwave radiation (CarbonPollution never defines the wavelengths of IR he/she is talking about) is blocked by the GHG in Earth’s atmosphere from hitting the surface.
It may, in fact, be a deceptive spin. On this we may be able to agree. But it’s a single tweet taken out of the context of what was clearly a dialogue. Many possible dialogues would have that statement be completely legitimate and not deceptive. Many others would not. Without that context (and I’m not about to look at his tweets to see) it’s not possible to tell.
As to the wavelength, it’s a fairly standard division among those who study atmospheric radiation physics: longwave is interpreted to mean wavelength greater than 4000 nm. I charitably assume that’s what he (or she) means by “longwave” since that usage is so standard.
duplicate
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Atmospheric_Transmission.png
Only an idiot or a researcher could utter such rubbish.
An idiot says it to make believe they know something !
A researcher says it because their car is more than 3 years old and its trade in value is in danger !
This is a beautiful example of what Wittgenstein was talking about when he used the phrase, “language on holiday”.
Stand outside in the shade, or under a passing cloud, and then feel the greater direct heat from the Sun when you walk out from the shade or the cloud passes by. That tells you that direct heat from the Sun is generally larger than ambient heat from the atmosphere. “CarbonPollution” is channeling the hysteria of “experts” like Trenberth and Hansen — and his very screen name, “CarbonPollution”, is just the propaganda enforced by the runaway EPA and Supreme Court, in tyrannously declaring carbon dioxide–the unavoidable and necessary exhalation of every animal, including humans, on Earth–to be an air “pollutant”, subject to “control” under the Clean Air Act passed decades ago (with real pollutants, like BLACK elemental carbon, in mind).
Gosh Harry, another logic fail – this time a straw man. Who ever claimed that direct heat from the sun is not larger than ambient heat from the atmosphere? Then we move on to red herrings – who cares about his screen name? And finally, we’re looking at a combination of both – with respect to carbon pollution. Of course it’s an exhalation of most (not every) member of the animal kingdom. But that’s a recycling process, hardly what happens in the burning of fossil fuels. But, fighting fire with fire, here’s a straw man: CO2 concentrations above 4% can be quickly fatal. Therefore there should be NO CO2 in the air, right?
Huh? 4% = 4,000ppm
Normal CO2 Levels
normal outdoor level: 350 – 450 ppm
acceptable levels: < 600 ppm
complaints of stiffness and odors: 600 – 1000 ppm
ASHRAE and OSHA standards: 1000 ppm
general drowsiness: 1000 – 2500 ppm
adverse health effects expected: 2500 – 5000 ppm
maximum allowed concentration within a 8 hour working period: 5000 ppm
The levels above are quite normal.
Extreme and Dangerous CO2 Levels
slightly intoxicating, breathing and pulse rate increase, nausea: 30,000 ppm
above plus headaches and sight impairment: 50,000 ppm
unconscious, further exposure death: 100,000 ppm
Carbon Dioxide Standard Levels
The recommendation in ASHRAE standard 62-1989 are:
classrooms and conference rooms 15 cfm per occupant
office space and restaurants 20 cfm per occupant
hospitals 25 cfm per occupant
15 cfm ventilation rate per occupant corresponds to 1000 ppm CO2
20 cfm ventilation rate per occupant corresponds to 800 ppm CO2
Now did I read your last sentence correct?
Therefore there should be NO CO2 in the air, right?
Dude, if I have read it correctly, you wouldn’t even be sitting there typing your utter crap. NO CO2 = NO LIFE! End of story.
EPIC logic fail
Correction to the above.
4% CO2 = 40,000ppm, the same as what your exhaled air contains – or about 100 times the amount of CO2 which was breathed in.
4% = 40000 ppm.
Look up the following words: irony, sarcasm, exaggeration.
That “second law of thermodynamics” nonsense is a pile of lying shit dreamed up by some deniers