MAY 23 2013
What Mattered in Obama’s Speech Today: Ending the Open-Ended ‘War on Terror’
Then we found out that all Americans are suspects in the war on terror, and that we are being spied on as part of that critically important war.
And now he is arming the terrorists and jumping into a new war.
Why not just ban Syrians from having guns?
http://en.rian.ru/russia/20130614/181661349/US-Chemical-Weapons-Report-in-Syria-Cooked–Russian-MP.html
Welcome to 1984
Orwell was a Fabian. The International realised they could not inspire Revolutionary Communism in England and America, so they implemented a delaying strategy, incrementally establishing the permanent Revolution in the West. These “Fabian” socialists named themselves after the Roman dictator who finally defeated Hannibal through a strategy of wearing down his opponent through a war of attrition and indirection.
Well documented narratives:
http://www.alor.org/Library/FabianSocialistContributiontotheCommunistAdvance.htm
http://www.awakeandarise.org/article/FabianWindow.htm
They have full control of the west, and now only Russia, China, and a few allies obstruct total global domination.
One only need read Animal Farm and 1984 to understand that Orwell was not a Fabian. The left is constantly trying to rewrite history and frame heroes as leftists and villains as conservative. Just as they claim Hitler was a right winger, they now want to lay claim to Orwell, in hopes of fooling yet another generation.
“Orwell was never a member of the Fabian Society (led by Sidney and Beatrice Webb with adherents like George Bernard Shaw) which he said was comprised of blow-hard intellectuals pretending to be Socialists when deep down they were Communists lusting for power and control.
Here’s an excerpt from the book THE ROAD TO WIGAN PIER which Orwell wrote in 1937 and which the so-called “Socialists” and Communists tried to have suppressed from publication:
Part Two: Chapter 11
“…The ugly fact is that most middle-class Socialists, while theoretically pining for a class-less society, cling like glue to their miserable fragments of social prestige….The Coles, Webbs, Stracheys, etc., are not exactly proletarian writers…Sometimes I look at a Socialist — the intellectual, tract-writing type of Socialist, with his pullover, his fuzzy hair, and his Marxian quotation — and wonder what the devil his motive really is. It is often difficult to believe that it is a love of anybody, especially of the working class, from whom he is of all people the furthest removed. The underlying motive of many Socialists, I believe, is simply a hypertrophied sense of order. The present state of affairs offends them not because it causes misery, still less because it makes freedom impossible, but because it is untidy; what they desire, basically, is to reduce the world to something resembling a chessboard. Take the plays of a lifelong Socialist like Shaw. How much understanding or even awareness of working-class life do they display? … You get the same thing in a more mealy-mouthed form in Mrs Sidney Webb’s autobiography, which gives, unconsciously, a most revealing picture of the high-minded Socialist slum-visitor. The truth is that, to many people calling themselves Socialists, revolution does not mean a movement of the masses with which they hope to associate themselves; it means a set of reforms which ‘we’, the clever ones, are going to impose upon ‘them’, the Lower Orders…”
http://www.orwelltoday.com/readerfabianorwell.shtml