h/t to Marc Morano
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on A Giant Eyesore
- Russell Cook on A Giant Eyesore
- Greg in NZ on Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- Greg in NZ on UK Labour To Save The Planet
- Gamecock on CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- conrad ziefle on A Giant Eyesore
- conrad ziefle on CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- arn on Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- arn on CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Peter Carroll on Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
Didn’t they say all the polar bears would starve because of ice free arctic by 2013?
https://twitter.com/NJSnowFan/status/372794505453654016/photo/1
around 5:20 you will see the Polar Bear
http://obuoy.datatransport.org/monitor#buoy7/movie
Buoy #7
http://obuoy.datatransport.org/monitor#overview/gpstracks
Dessler is now a legitimate challenger to Mann for the dumbest dumbass professor award evah!
And when you bottom out at Mann’s desperation level, your condition is terminal.
Dessler has been at that level for years! And he keeps digging his hole!
Yup! They have been telling us for years and years that “the science is settled!” so why do they keep issuing new reports? Almost makes me question their sincerity… 🙂
He has no sincerity to question.
That can’t be true.
I was under the impression that it was a requirement that each successive report was more alarmist than the previous one!
If the next report is “exactly” what they told us, then they are unnecessarily killing trees, altering land use, changing the climate.
“The trees required to produce this report are partly responsible for the climate change thus far. Recommend we stop producing reports.”
What a bunch of arrogant….
You’d need to redesign the prison cages for these guys, seeing how they’re slimier than a grease monkey and would slip right through those cell bars-:)
Steve? I wonder if you might do a short bit on Arrhenius. Specifically, the FACT that he drastically lowered his estimate on climate sensitivity, some years after the 1896 date dudlser mentions.
I’ll second that. The climate predators never mention that part of his work (wonder why?).
Here’s a good source on Arrhenius’ mistake in his 1896 work that Dessler cites, and his later (sort of grudging – sound familiar?) scaling back of the warming predictions.
http://members.casema.nl/errenwijlens/co2/
It’s a close race to work out who is the bigger crank. Dessler or Trenberth?
So according to Clinton goon Dessler it’s the Same BS different day.
Basically the UN IPCC are like the jokers with the doomsday clock from back in the cold war days. .Well maybe the doomsday clock bunch had a tad more credibility.
Well funded Doomsayers. ..