h/t to Marc Morano
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
Recent Comments
- Allan Shelton on NASA Sea Level
- Disillusioned on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Ulric Lyons on Technology Advances
- oeman50 on NASA Sea Level
- Gordon Vigurs on NASA Sea Level
- Lasse on NASA Sea Level
- Scott Allen on “getting smaller”
- Greg in NZ on NASA Sea Level
- arn on “getting smaller”
- Gordon Vigurs on “fair & equitable”
Didn’t they say all the polar bears would starve because of ice free arctic by 2013?
https://twitter.com/NJSnowFan/status/372794505453654016/photo/1
around 5:20 you will see the Polar Bear
http://obuoy.datatransport.org/monitor#buoy7/movie
Buoy #7
http://obuoy.datatransport.org/monitor#overview/gpstracks
Dessler is now a legitimate challenger to Mann for the dumbest dumbass professor award evah!
And when you bottom out at Mann’s desperation level, your condition is terminal.
Dessler has been at that level for years! And he keeps digging his hole!
Yup! They have been telling us for years and years that “the science is settled!” so why do they keep issuing new reports? Almost makes me question their sincerity… 🙂
He has no sincerity to question.
That can’t be true.
I was under the impression that it was a requirement that each successive report was more alarmist than the previous one!
If the next report is “exactly” what they told us, then they are unnecessarily killing trees, altering land use, changing the climate.
“The trees required to produce this report are partly responsible for the climate change thus far. Recommend we stop producing reports.”
What a bunch of arrogant….
You’d need to redesign the prison cages for these guys, seeing how they’re slimier than a grease monkey and would slip right through those cell bars-:)
Steve? I wonder if you might do a short bit on Arrhenius. Specifically, the FACT that he drastically lowered his estimate on climate sensitivity, some years after the 1896 date dudlser mentions.
I’ll second that. The climate predators never mention that part of his work (wonder why?).
Here’s a good source on Arrhenius’ mistake in his 1896 work that Dessler cites, and his later (sort of grudging – sound familiar?) scaling back of the warming predictions.
http://members.casema.nl/errenwijlens/co2/
It’s a close race to work out who is the bigger crank. Dessler or Trenberth?
So according to Clinton goon Dessler it’s the Same BS different day.
Basically the UN IPCC are like the jokers with the doomsday clock from back in the cold war days. .Well maybe the doomsday clock bunch had a tad more credibility.
Well funded Doomsayers. ..