Climate change could turn Greenland green by 2100 | Environment | theguardian.com
More utter, total bullshit from experts. This is what Greenland looks like during the summer of 2013.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
Recent Comments
- Greg in NZ on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- arn on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Trevor on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- czechlist on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- arn on COP29 Preview
- arn on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- stewartpid on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on A Giant Eyesore
not sure what’s alarming about new forests?
I know, they make this sound like a bad thing!
Hey, steve-o, Rush is giving you a big plug right now on the radio. Get ready for some ‘traffic.’
🙂
What is he discussing?
In my travels (I think from Anthony’s site) I have seen a hand drawn map of Greenland purportedly from the early 1500s, with extensive topography clearly shown. I realize the ice sheet has survived previous warm periods, but this map was a thing to behold. Still looking for it.
Are you talking about the Piri Reis map? That also allegedly shows the actual land area of Antarctica.
I have always wondered how Greenland got it’s name. Seems a murderer named it from Iceland.
http://ancientstandard.com/2010/12/17/how-greenland-got-its-name/
Maybe one day Greenland will return to tje conditions the Vikings found. I would think in about 115K years during the next interglacial.
This claim requires melting 2.6 x10^6 Gtons in 86 years, or 30,200 GT/yr. Current melt rate for Greenland is 100 – 200 GT/yr, which is a factor of 200 lower than needed.
It may seem like a factor of 200 is a stretch, but Hansen’s predicted future floods require sea level rise today that is fast approaching a one comma exaggeration.
Another green energy area where one comma exaggerations show up is actual output versus nameplate capacity of wind farms.
btw, one comma = 1,000
Is the progress of Yong Sheng slowing?
http://www.exactearth.com/media-centre/recent-ship-tracks/The-Yong-Sheng/
Zoom in for date/time.
Also seems to have been joined by nuclear breaker 50 let Pobedy
http://www.sailwx.info/shiptrack/shipposition.phtml?call=UGYU
Yes, it looks like that the 50 let Pobedy is at the same position as the Yong Sheng. I can’t get the coordinates but, the overlap visually of both ships shows them at the same location. Sorry, can’t give you the tracking method as it uses a password.
I’m not sure how exact this ice cover is that is connected with Google earth, but the location of both ships visually compared would be white (estimated). http://oceans.taraexpeditions.org/carte/
juergenuie
Thanks for the link, also spotted a reduction in speed here:-
http://www.marinetraffic.com/ais/datasheet.aspx?datasource=SHIPS_CURRENT&alpha=Y&mode=&orderby=SHIPNAME&sort_order=ASC&var_page=6
Sadly reporting is haphazard, presently showing circa 9 knots, which seems high given the track, had been making 14 knots through Chukchi sea.
Will be interesting to watch the progress
Canada reporting some new ice forming in Archipelago. Not much, but it’s a start.
http://ice-glaces.ec.gc.ca/prods/WIS56SD/20130826180000_WIS56SD_0007236138.gif
http://ice-glaces.ec.gc.ca/prods/WIS55SD/20130826180000_WIS55SD_0007236121.gif
As far as Greenland, I guess these articles just keep the faithful, well, faithful. Just got to have those experts in fantasy to keep the train moving along.
A prediction for 87 years ahead of time is entirely meaningless, unless based on extrapolation. Considering there has been no warming in 17 years, extrapolation shows no ice loss at all.