We do have a moral obligation to block hysteria and dangerous policy based on junk and corrupt science.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
- The Origins Of Modern Climate Science
- If An Academic Said It, It Must Be True
- Record Snow Cover
- Stopping Climate Misinformation
- Arctic Ice Free In Two Years
Recent Comments
- gordon vigurs on Causes Of Earthquakes
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- Bob G on Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- arn on “what the science shows”
- Bob G on Causes Of Earthquakes
- Bob G on “what the science shows”
- conrad ziefle on On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Tel on “what the science shows”
- Solar Mutant Ninjaneer on On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- conrad ziefle on On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
Junk, corrupt, delusional and let’s not forget criminal non-science!
The new religion has manifested into an ugly beast that is in need of extinguishing.
This summer was a real disaster for the alarmists, wasn’t it? They are getting outright bizzare now.
Way to misquote the Guardian. It really improves your credibility.
Most of the people here can think and understand the concept of a logical corollary. Were you born without critical thinking skills, or is that a recent development?
Steve obviously you are one of those “virulent anti-environmentalists” (to quote The Guardian). Actually, the more you put this Guardian article in context by quoting directly from it, the more and more stupid it becomes.
Whenever I see someone engaging in literalism that isn’t obviously tongue-in-cheek, whether they are doing so unintentionally or intentionally, I take it as a sign of absolute intense stupidity. Referring to themselves as ‘Politics Watcher’ as if they are somehow above politics really adds a nice clown face on top.
That article is just another in a long line of pieces written to make people who question the infallible ‘authority’ of AGW supporters look like morons when it is in fact the people that blindly follow that are the real fools. You can call peop,e names all day long but that does not change the fact that the predictions made by the climate models thus far have been flawed to say the least and yet we are to believe what these experts have to say without questioning them?
The Guardian has gone full fruit loop these last few months – which is saying something. That ‘pause’ is causing them immense distress, the poor luvvies, hence diversionary articles like the one linked.
Frantic arm-waving, while global temps do anything but signal catastrophe.
And you have said it. It is the temperature standstill and the fear of cooling that has caused the upsurge in shouting.
mark serreze now claims that the Arctic will be ice-free by 2030 http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/18/china-northeastern-sea-route-trial-voyage
I thought he said in 2007 that it would be ice-free this year?
Serreze has always said 2030.
He has planned his retirement well.
It is not good enough to say there could be a long term problem which may eventually require a long term solution. No, you have to say it is a “crisis”, like we need your money right here and now.
The actual science shows that there is no “crisis”. No warming the last 15 years and only one 18 year period of significant warming since 1940. It isn’t apparently good enough to say that human innovation and free markets will solve the problems naturally over the next 50 years. No, it has to be a phony “crisis”, requiring an immediate and huge redistribution of wealth as well as throwing a monkey wrench into the economy.
And a wholesale overturning of the founding principles, and laws, of the United States of America–don’t leave that out.
what the heck is the “scientific fraternity”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdFLPn30dvQ
it’s all clear now! 🙂