Alabama cooled dramatically from 1920 to 1970. NASA got rid of this inconvenient decline, by cooling the past and warming the present a total of 1.5C. Note how NASA magically turned the 1895-1940 cooling trend into a warming trend.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- arn on Gaslighting 1924
- Gordon Vigurs on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution Model
- Ohio Cyclist on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Fact Checking NASA
- arn on Climate Attribution Model



So is V2 Raw and V3 Adjusted?
v3 adjusted – v2 adjusted
Their TOB rationalizations are found wanting.
1. Decadal comparison reveals bias: Its amazing that people could read thermometers in the 1850s just fine, but something happened to thousands of independent observers in the 1920s-1930s. According to the TOBs adjusters, thousands of independent observers got sleepy in the 1930s and forged data. However, observers were as pure as driven snow in the 1850s.
2. Non-constant TOBs adjustment reveals bias. The TOBs adjustment differs by year, increasing in magnitude. It should be constant throughout the temperature record, instead it is linear.
The Scottsboro charts (in the animated gif) are not (imho) lined up correctly: 17.5C on the back one lines with 17C on the front one.
So now it look like I was wrong! Thanks, Steve.
Cheat, cheat, never beat!
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.