NASA is constantly cooling the past and warming the present – in order to make it appear that Hansen’s theories aren’t the miserable failure which they actually are.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- william on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Robertvd on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
The new Surtr has spoken. Amen.
I really love this theme “Wrecks our story, Let’s get rid of it”.
This is what characterizes the core of your blog. Staccato type messages like bulets from a machine gun. The “jumping graph’s” leave absolutely no room for any discussion as they represent noting less but “hard forensic evidence” of large scale data manipulation.
IMO there is no better way to reveal the AGW scam because even a six year old can understand what’t going on.
This is the way to wreck the entire “cult” most effectively.
Please proceed. I look forward to the next “deadly” shot from the hip.
You’re a killer.
“IMO there is no better way to reveal the AGW scam because even a six year old can understand what’s going on”
Are Climate Alarmists Smarter Than a Six-Year Old!, now that’s an idea for a show.
I can’t even understand how they are allowed to make adjustments to observations. I can see adjustments to estimations but definitely not actual measurements.
The step-functions look like there were fundamental changes in observing, as when the temperatures were taken, or the type of instrument used, or the location of the weather station.
At 1904/1905: you know what was done?
From 1939 – 1947, the change was progressive, as if multiple stations were being converted over time to a new system. You know what the deal was?
I see many stations in the Arctic where the 1930s were adjusted way down in V3.
Dear Internal Revenue Service,
Herein find my revised figures for my past tax liabilities. The fact that they all tilt in my favour is none of your business. Please remit the total amount of overpayment for previous years as soon as possible.