August 1962 : melted (Arctic experts tell us that the ice was very thick in the 1960s)
Seadragon (SSN-584), foreground, and her sister Skate (SSN-578) during a rendezvous at the North Pole in August 1962.
August 2013 : frozen solid
August 1962 : melted (Arctic experts tell us that the ice was very thick in the 1960s)
Seadragon (SSN-584), foreground, and her sister Skate (SSN-578) during a rendezvous at the North Pole in August 1962.
August 2013 : frozen solid
Question – is this from the same exact location, and can you cite evidence of such? Otherwise, it could easily be assumed that the two pictures are from totally different areas of the world. The first pic could be assumed to be at the edge of the frozen ice surrounding the N.P. Just a thought.
I believe it by the way, BUT I have to allow for discrepencies as well. 🙂
Melted 1962 picture is at the pole. Frozen 2013 picture is 400 km south of the pole.
There is always the chance the government lied about the submarine rendezvous at the North pole. I don’t see a motive, yet there is a chance.
So, if the government lied about that, then why should anyone believe what the government has to say about temperature data?? Especially given the government’s honesty track record??
I have come to not believe anything coming from the gov. They speak with forked tongue, although Obama spoke the truth when he said he will fundamentally transform America.
Touche’
Next weeks weather pattern over the Arctic. This pattern may be locked in for a little while.
http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~fxg1/ECMWF_12z/hgtcomp.html
Looks like extreme cold sitting right on top of the NW Passage.