Valid Data Not Acceptable When Discussing Thin Rotten Decayed Ice

12 Responses to Valid Data Not Acceptable When Discussing Thin Rotten Decayed Ice

1. Jeffk says:

   August 13, 2013 at 1:25 am

   The only explanation is globalists’ need for a “common enemy” after communism failed and everybody laughs at terrorism now. Climate fits that bill. It justifies the globalist agenda to build a new Tower of Babel, probably in Antarctica with CGI like they thought the moonwalk was, but really CGI this time.

   Reply
2. Traitor In Chief says:

   August 13, 2013 at 1:54 am

   Wow. Steve, you’re just so sneaky. You didn’t even tell us the ice was rotten. And here I thought it was perfectly ripe.

   Reading the thoughts of psychotic warmers is always an adventure.

   Reply
3. miked1947 says:

   August 13, 2013 at 2:15 am

   It is amazing what they get out of their alternate virtual worlds they build with their Sim Earth models.

   Reply
4. BC says:

   August 13, 2013 at 2:19 am

   I wonder if those poor penguins in Antarctica know that they’re having to cross record-high, “thin, rotten” ice to get to their nesting grounds? Perhaps MaryL could volunteer to help them along, since the temps are so balmy?

   Reply
5. Chuck L says:

   August 13, 2013 at 2:20 am

   The alarmists are psychotic. In another era, they would have burned witches or thrown their newborn into a volcano to appease their gods. With all the evidence pointing to cooling, rather than warming, their psychoses are magnified and their desperation and shrillness grow.

   Reply
6. forgottenman2013 says:

   August 13, 2013 at 2:34 am

   Reblogged this on The Firewall.

   Reply
7. Jimbo says:

   August 13, 2013 at 2:44 am

   We have have flippy floppy ice, wibbly wobbly ice, rotten to the damned core ice. What next? If they sea ice extent grows are they going to call it denialist ice?

   Reply
8. Anto says:

   August 13, 2013 at 3:26 am

   Argumentum ad Hominem fallacy. The AGWing catastrophist’s favourite starting point.

   Reply
9. Tim Spence says:

   August 13, 2013 at 6:36 am

   I’ve a good idea who MaryL is, her venomous hatred always spills into her comment

   Reply
10. Mike Mellor says:

    August 13, 2013 at 9:51 am

    I have to call Jerry Agar on his statement that there would be a lot of consequences to disappearing ice, and not many of them would be good. He makes this confident assertion without the least evidence that reduced sea ice will have more negative effects than positive.

    Reply
    • slimething says:

      August 13, 2013 at 1:01 pm

      Yeah, I’ve wondered for some time what the big deal is about ice free summers in the Arctic. It’s like a holy relic or something.

      Reply
11. John B., M.D. says:

    August 13, 2013 at 4:46 pm

    Steve – Keep “cranking” out the actual data.

    Reply