Only a complete moron would believe Obama’s half-baked story about why he needs to immediately bomb Syria without consulting the Congress.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Trump’s ‘ridiculous’ tweet about California wildfires”
- Coldest Inauguration Ever?
- Hurricanes And Tornadoes In The US Last Year
- “global climate phenomena, not regional temperature variations”
- “Western landscapes in presettlement era were very smoky places.”
- “CALIFORNIA FIRES BEYOND CONTROL”
- “EIGHT SOUTHLAND AREAS SWEPT BY FLAMES”
- The Bel Air Fire Of 1961
- The Thing Of The Past
- “‘extremely unlikely’ without climate change, says scientists”
- Holocene Optimum In Alaska
- ‘Two incredible extreme events’
- The End Of Snow
- Google Maps Adds Context
- Thing Of The Past Update
- Expert Government Forecasting
- Thing Of The Past Comes To England
- “far outside the range of observed variability”
- African Desertification
- Grok Explains Polar Bears
- The Climate Denial Money Machine
- President Trump : “decisively defeat the climate hysteria hoax.”
- New Plan To Rob The Citizenry
- “Fifteen days to flatten the curve”
- Warm December 1923
Recent Comments
- Gamecock on “global climate phenomena, not regional temperature variations”
- arn on “Trump’s ‘ridiculous’ tweet about California wildfires”
- conrad ziefle on Hurricanes And Tornadoes In The US Last Year
- conrad ziefle on Coldest Inauguration Ever?
- arn on The Bel Air Fire Of 1961
- conrad ziefle on “global climate phenomena, not regional temperature variations”
- conrad ziefle on The Bel Air Fire Of 1961
- arn on “CALIFORNIA FIRES BEYOND CONTROL”
- arn on “global climate phenomena, not regional temperature variations”
- arn on “global climate phenomena, not regional temperature variations”
I agree with your assessment. If Obama wants to operate as a dictator, he needs to move to a country that uses that form of government.
Or just do it anyway, as if he was a dictator…
I do believe that would be a question best directed toward Valerie, you know the one who wears the pants, has a spine, is coldblooded and lacks any heart…
When its not your business, and you have nothing to gain, why get into the fight. It is a civil war and we should not be attempting to pick the winner when both sides are losers.
It would the biggest mistake for the US to get involved in Syria. It is quite possible that the “other side” used chemical weapons as well. The other side comprises some really extreme xealots etc. Look what happened in Egypt a 100% turn round not ready for democracy yet. Anyway NH ice still at 2005 levels haha
The same morons that reelected him.
It probably doesn’t have anything to do with saving face or saving souls for their 72 virgins…
His advisors tell him there’s only a small chance of widespread war, but since they haven’t been able to collapse the economy because of their miscalculation in gauging the resilient Capitalists resolve, the good attack will stop the entire world’s economic growth immediately, so the net gain is in his favor and it’s their most brilliant idea ever-:)
Obama’s Muslim is showing. He wants to kill some people . . . because he can.
“The best way to address bullying is to stop it before it starts.” – http://www.stopbullying.gov/
Why Is It Urgent To Bomb Syria?
The same reason it was urgent to bomb Iraq and Libya. To stop these countries breaking up the petro dollar, moves towards which instantly converted those countries into pariah, terrorist nations. Likewise Iran and Syria.
If and when this happens the oil backed dollar becomes worthless and the 90% of Global Debt which is owed by the USA can never be repaid. The dollar and the world financial system then will collapse. While this is going to happen anyway the power base of the genocidal psychpaths that overturned the Constitution fails. If they just kill a few thousand Muslim men women and children (or maybe a few million) they can keep themselves on the gravy train and be the World Power for a few months longer. After its all over they will just have to start again.
While the USA and it’s brown nosing buddies in Europe (especially the UK) are intent on pursuing this course and while it may keep the whole rotten mass of corruption running a little while longer there is a significant chance that a Syrian response (e.g. ballistic anti-ship missiles or a lucky shot or two from something airborne) would mean the USA lost the initial engagement.
This means either:
A) The US backs off and relies on its own terrorist groups on the ground in Syria (e.g. Al Quaeda) to do the job for it.
B) A full blown troops on the ground Invasion (i.e. overt WW3 ‘cos the Chinese and Russians will not tolerate that)
C) Fairly instant World Financial System Collapse.
My guess is the pschos will reject (C) which will finish them off so it looks like (A) or (B) or (A) followed by (B) …… then followed by (C).
Rational concerned people would have chosen (C) long ago,
We got a lot of complete morons.
So, that means 47% of the population automatically believe him……without question.
Obama has to be very careful about bombing dictators, he could easily end up on the receiving end.
When your enemies are at war, support whoever is losing currently.