Not only does NCDC massively tamper with the measured data, but then they spread their UHI/Homogenization corrupted data around to non-existent thermometer readings. nearly 30% of all reported USHCN data is now imaginary.
Note : I am using a different counting method than in the past. I used to report overage of fabricated data above measured, and am now reporting the percent of all reported data which is fabricated.
That is one hell of a hockey stick they got going there … was Mann involved?
Your being a member of the Dwindling Few, this is how people with half a brain view your data.
http://jir.com/graph_contest/index.html
Half a brain, maybe. But those possessing a complete, functioning brain know better.
Sorry to hear, matayaya, I always wondered about that. Birth defect?
Post as klaatu elsewhere, ‘matayaya’? Same MO, same personal attacks.
Matayaya so your half brain can understand –
http://www.frugal-cafe.com/public_html/frugal-blog/frugal-cafe-blogzone/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/cooling-new-global-warming-political-cartoon.jpg
Now give the BIG government all your money.
The great advantage of more imaginary readings is that it makes it easier to fudge the results.
It increases the wholesale return on the investment on the adjusting of some few facts!
It seems outrageous that they are cutting down on station data. Billions allocated for climate study and they can’t maintain a few thermometers? If not, then just go with the satellite data. But since the satellite data shows a pause, we can’t do that, can we? There has to be massive human intervention to come up with the desired results.
We are approaching 1/3 of all NCDC data being invented whole-cloth. It is worthless. Use satellite data instead.
Until they start manipulating that data as well…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2014/10/22/weather-service-stops-receiving-satellite-data-issues-warning-about-forecast-reliability/?hpid=z5