Mark Boslough says he is speaking about climate at AGU. He also says he doesn’t know much about climate.
AGU is the same organization which had confessed fraudster and thief Peter Gleick as their ethics officer.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Fifteen Year Old Children In Australia Control The Weather
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
Recent Comments
- William on Fifteen Year Old Children In Australia Control The Weather
- Francis Barnett on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Francis Barnett on More Snow Is Less
- Gordon Vigurs on Fifteen Year Old Children In Australia Control The Weather
- Disillusioned on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Francis Barnett on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
Interesting guy, to say the least…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Boslough
“Boslough is an advocate of laws to reform the 19th-century law known as RS 2477 to prevent it from being used to take private property for public use.[25] His fight turned into a prolonged battle with off-road clubs pulling out boulders and seedlings that Boslough used to try and restore his property.[26] He also received verbal and physical threats before he successfully defended a lawsuit (Ramey v. Boslough) in which the ownership of a four-wheel-drive road across his Colorado property was challenged by a plaintiff who was backed by off-road recreation interests.[27] He used this experience to argue that the “right to radiate” is a prescriptive private property right, and that carbon polluters must compensate individuals for degrading their personal cooling capacity.[28]”
Ummmmmm…OK…..
The irony meter exploded… again.. and they wonder why they have so much trouble being taken seriously.
The idea of Agw is physics by definition. Perhaps some organic chemistry too. But surely a physics excersise.
No, no, no, it is a religion and is totally magical.
I’m afraid you are more correct than me.
This seams to be a problem in this country. We have a constitutional scholar as President that doesn’t know that much about the Constitutional.
I think the problem here is that Mark Boslough was expecting physics questions like: “Why is the fuzzy polar bear scared? Is his iceberg really going melt???” Or “Why can’t we get those mean old Republicans to stop carbon pollution? CO2 is a killer gas!! Eeeeek.”
Boslough is a physicist, i.e., a reductionist and simplifier.
A bunch of us found out the dictionary is the only non-physics book he reads.
In the Twitter exchange he asks why is he says
Then ask him not to reference the following people: 😉
• James Hansen astronomer / physicist
• John Cook: bachelor of physics
• Grant Foster (Tamino): theoretical physics
• Dana Nuccitelli: masters degree in physics
• Joe Romn: physicist
• John Holdren: plasma physicist
• Gavin Schmidt: mathematician
• David Suzuki: geneticist
• Paul Nurse: geneticist
• Rajendra Pachauri: railroad engineer
• Bill Nye: mechanical engineer
Grrrr. I meant.
In the Twitter exchange he
asks why is hesaysAGU is sponsored by big oil….http://fallmeeting.agu.org/2013/general-information/thank-you-to-our-sponsors/
……and we all know what that means……pfffffffttt!
Yes, it means AGU is 100% behind CAGW since it was invented by Big Oil in the first place. That is why skeptics are always accused of being in the pay of big oil.
Always accuse your enemy of what you are doing first. It spikes his guns beautifully.
Banks, Shell Oil and CAGW
I hadn’t noticed this before but Swiss Re is on the AGU sponsor list as well…could it be Big Insurance is seeking bigger premium. Say it ain’t so!
This Boslough guy is going to be a big up and comer in the left-o-sphere. He’s got the sheep skins, he’s got the crazy based on his concept of “personal cooling capacity,” and he’s got the nastiness that the left loves to promote.
He’ll probably make it to “scientific” advisor when the next Donk administration is in power hopefully in a LOONNNGGG time from now.
The original tweet was a for fanboi’s to fill seats and never ask questions related to reality or their failure.
I thought SG asked a perfectly valid physics question?
What a plonker!
His column is hilariously uninformed — he even called the agreement for China to triple its emissions by 2030 (and which they will probably ignore by then anyway) “historic.”