As of 1975, the world’s top scientists saw no warming from 1900 through 1970. The National Academy of Sciences generated the graph below in 1975.
The hockey stick was upside down, which made the team unhappy. They wanted to get rid of that unpleasant “blip” around 1940, which left their pet theory in shambles.
From: Tom Wigley <[email protected]>
To: Phil Jones <[email protected]>
Subject: 1940s
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:25:38 -0600
Cc: Ben Santer <[email protected]>It would be good to remove at least part of the 1940s blip, but we are still left with “why the blip”.
So they did just that. They removed the 1940s blip, as well as all that unpleasant post-1940’s cooling. The animation below shows how the data has been changed since 1975.
At the time, there wasn’t any question about global cooling, so our friends at NASA and NCDC simply rewrote history.
“He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past.”
? George Orwell, 1984
How many of the adjusted observations were collected by the dedicated NOAA observer network, including meticulous, committed Thomas Jefferson award winners?
If you look at the “new” version only you’d have to wonder why anyone would have thought there might be a coming ice age on the 70’s. The ice age scenario only makes sense when you look at the old version
The old, not adjusted to ridiculous levels version…in other words, the version of the graph that actually represents the observed data.
In the new version you are not allowed to mention about the 70’s ice age scare.
This posting is what we call a “corker” in Oz. It’s simplicity lays bare the lies and data fraud in both directions, as highlighted by Dean’s comment.
Kudos, Mr Goddard.
It’s not the official, only the IPCC can decide what’s official. Therefore whatever happened in the past doesn’t matter.
You have to wonder how cold the past is going to get in the future. And how long they can carry on with this game
uh….. It was a lot more than a “blip”.
Hey, don’t let a few “inconvenient truths” get in the way of a good theory.