This 1971 National Geographic map showed the ice edge about the same location as this summer. Experts say that Walrus can’t survive this, and must have gone extinct.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Greg in NZ on Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- conrad ziefle on Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Margaret Smith on Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Bruce of Newcastle on Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- arn on Obliterating Bill Gates
- oeman50 on Harris To Win In A Blowout
- conrad ziefle on The End Of Everything
- arn on The End Of Everything
- conrad ziefle on The End Of Everything
“Experts” like the New York Times has it seems. Experts with out a clue. “National Geographic” = propaganda with pretty pictures.
What would doom the Walrus is if the Artic ever freezes solid and remains in this frozen state. Walrus depend on an Arctic that freezes and then defrosts because this drives the annual Walrus migration from the Bearing Sea into the high Artic caving grounds and then back again every year before freeze up. This also allows the Northern and Southern feeding grounds to rest and regenerate between intensive periods of Walrus exploitation.
History is not big in climate science.
Have you been to Walmart lately?
I thought it was in ’67 along with Paul… Goo goo g’joob.
James Bond lived twice
Osama died twice
Why shouldn’t walrussians be allowed to go extinct two times?
(and i don’t dare to guess how much global warming and co2 “2x walrus went extinct” have caused.)
Years ago there used to be a popular TV quiz show where contestants were asked to identify a hit song from just the initial notes. In a similar vein, can we determine who were the authors of these famous quotes in “Name that Scientist”?
https://twitter.com/ImaBannedd/status/533588569060040704/photo/1
That cartoon needs to have this newest scientist added for the icing on the cake:
The BBC had a recent program where professor Mike Lockwood said. “There’s a 20 percent probability that we could be back in Maunder conditions within 40 years.”
The video ends with this:
“On the one hand you’ve got, perhaps, a cooling sun, but on the other had you’ve got human activity that can counter that.”
“So even if the planet as a whole continues to warm, if we enter a Maunder Minimum the future for northern Europe could be cold and frozen winters for decades to come.”
ROTFLMAO!
H/T to IceAgeNow
http://iceagenow.info/2014/11/video-sun-sleep/#comment-245092
Maybe it the walrus that need Viagra.
Call me when Venice Italy is under water.