About To Get Pummeled

I’m in San Diego where everyone is complaining about the cold. The weather seems pretty close to perfect here, as I am headed to this nonsense in Colorado and New Mexico for the next week.

ScreenHunter_5594 Dec. 27 21.28

10-Day Temperature Outlook for the Conterminous U.S.

The US and Europe are facing near record cold like in 1977-1979,  and NOAA is about to announce that 2014 is the “hottest year ever”

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

44 Responses to About To Get Pummeled

  1. philjourdan says:

    You are in SD! Yea, I will pummel you! I do not get there for another 6 weeks! Sheer jealousy!

    Enjoy it! But then when I am out there, you will be freezing your arse off back in MD. 😉

  2. skeohane says:

    Welcome back to Colorado, just checked the temperature, it’s 7° at 8pm, going to be subzero easily by dawn on the western slope.

  3. Andy DC says:

    After a very mild December for most of the US so far, it looks like the very cold November pattern should get reestablished during this upcoming week, with much below normal temperatures coast to coast and border to border.

  4. Marsh says:

    Despite all the brainwashing & propaganda tactics to boost Warming ; I still find it strange, how so many can be naive and gullible to accept such AGW nonsense ; it’s just like a blind faith mentality. There has to be a religious mindset to it ; this also underscores a key weakness in the human race. Perhaps, some cold hard evidence: like mega tons of Ice, may at least get them thinking ?

  5. Jason Calley says:

    Of course this is the hottest year ever! And unemployment is at 5%! And inflation is at 2%! And 97% of all climate scientists can prove it!

    Bah! I was about to ask, “why would any thinking person believe such obvious lies?” when I realized that no thinking person would. The more accurate question is “why do so many people refuse to think even when the evidence is right in front of their nose?”

    • ossqss says:

      A salesman’s dream.

      Most folks do homework.

    • Sparks says:

      They do, the’re just a bit slow! yep! the whole bunch are. seriously!

    • au1corsair says:

      How about this, Jason Calley: you are hearing what is in the mainstream news media (print, electronic) and government statements. Even though Congress is now majority Republican, the bureaucracy and media are overwhelmingly Democratic and share the same agenda. What is the mindset of the opinion polls–and why would “public opinion” affect the Scientific Method? Of course if “opinion polls” are “Official Opinions” as the British Security Coordination did to the USA during 1940, that answer is obvious.

      http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2006/aug/19/military.secondworldwar
      “Nobody really knows how many people ended up working for BSC – as agents or sub-agents or sub-sub-agents – although I have seen the figure mentioned of up to 3,000. Certainly at the height of its operations in late 1941 there were many hundreds of agents and many hundreds of fellow travellers (enough finally to stir the suspicions of Hoover, for one). Three thousand British agents spreading propaganda and mayhem in a staunchly anti-war America. It almost defies belief. Try to imagine a CIA office in Oxford Street with 3,000 US operatives working in a similar way. The idea would be incredible – but it was happening in America in 1940 and 1941, and the organisation grew and grew.”

      The same source mentioned that at the time 80% of the USA had an “Isolationist” attitude, mostly because of being manipulated into World War One (and most Americans regarded American participation in World War One as unnecessary).

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Comes_to_America
      “In October 1939, 82% of Americans blame Germany for starting the war in Europe, while in January 1941, after the Fall of France, and also the founding of the Tripartite Pact, which was clearly aimed against the United States, the question “Should we keep out of war, or aid Britain, even at the risk of war?”, AID BRITAIN got 68% of the vote. This increase in pro-Allied sentiment triggers Lend Lease aid to Britain (and to the Soviet Union after it is attacked by Germany).”

      Thinking alike, getting the same data–of course they’ll ignore it the same way! And BSC was but one of the many successful propaganda campaigns waged against the American citizen during the Twentieth Century. The “68%” mentioned in “Why We Fight: War Comes to America” was a fabrication–admitted to only recently. I wonder how the Twenty-Second Century will view the Anthropogenic Climate Change propaganda coup?

      http://www.global-greenhouse-warming.com/anthropogenic-climate-change.html
      “Anthropogenic climate change refers to the production of greenhouse gases emitted by human activity. By examining the polar ice cores, scientists are convinced that human activity has increased the proportion of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, which has skyrocketed over the past few hundred years. The IPCC, Fourth Report released in 2007 stated that, multiple lines of evidence confirms that the post-industrial rise in greenhouse gases does not stem from natural mechanisms. In other words this is anthropogenic climate change, and the significant increases in the atmosphere of these potent greenhouse gases are a result of human activity.The most potent of the greenhouse gases are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N20). Alarmingly, these are a result of anthropogenic climate change, and the gases are at the highest levels for over 650,000 years.”
      “The vertical pathway is cause for alarm, as CO2 levels correlate highly with an increase in average global surface temperatures.”

      Still talking “hot is hot and cold is hot because we say so.” The elephant in the room is more than seven billion carbon dioxide spewing humans–as well as our machines. Forget for a moment that billions of us worthless breathers maintain the current infrastructure that permits our high-tech civilization and advances the frontiers of Science–and be very afraid that Mother Earth “cannot sustain” more than a few million of us humans (this source gives two billion–but not two billion Americans):
      http://www.worldpopulationbalance.org/3_times_sustainable
      Current global population of over 7 billion is already two to three times higher than the sustainable level. Several recent studies show that Earth’s resources are enough to sustain only about 2 billion people at a European standard of living.
      “An average European consumes far more resources than any of the poorest two billion people in the world. However, Europeans use only about half the resources of Americans, on average.
      “Currently, over 7 billion of us are consuming about 50% more resources than Earth is producing – during any given time period. For example, in the past twelve months we have consumed the resources that it took the planet about eighteen months to produce. We are consuming our resource base.
      “Obviously, this 50% overshoot is not sustainable. Another crucial point to understand is this: the longer we overshoot and consume more resources than the sustainable level, the more the long-term “sustainable level” actually declines!”

      Panic! The world must become Europe or perish!

  6. Lance says:

    I had to check the temps in Phoenix, as it was a frost warning last night, and didn’t want to have my Ficus tree lose it’s leaves again, but it went to 33 apparently so I’m good for another day…

      • Ernest Bush says:

        It was 34 degrees at my house this morning at 7 in Yuma. Three degrees lower overnight will have farmers wetting their pants here. In San Diego the humidity is normally so high that it doesn’t cool much below 50 overnight. I noticed the humidity is below 40 percent which let temps drop into the 40’s. This is so normal this time of year that I’m surprised people are griping about it. If it were raining heavily, you could probably drive into a blizzard by going west on I-8 for 45 minutes to Pine Valley. This happened to me some years back on Black Friday. Quite an end to a Christmas shopping expedition.

        • philjourdan says:

          Remember a few years ago when you had that subfreezing snap? It played havoc on the Bougainvillaea. But it was also in January. Keep it there. I want 70s when I head out to Imperial Valley in February. 😉

  7. omanuel says:

    Thank you, Steven, for your continuing effort to expose purposeful deception of the American public.

    Since government deception is incompatible with self-governance, the issue is far more serious than possible causes of climate change.

  8. Pathway says:

    A low of 4 F last night here in the high desert. Speaking of high, Colorado ranks second in marijuana use for people surveyed during the last month. RI is number one.

    • Ernest Bush says:

      I was surprised at the 1 in 8 figure being considered high (no pun intended). In parts of California just sitting in the right spot can get you high. It makes me question the specific.

    • Frank K. says:

      Are these the same people who vilify smoking cigarettes? Inhaling toxic combustion products from marijuana is apparently OK…

  9. gofer says:

    Massive Snowfall in Alps Traps 15,000 Vehicles.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/11314946/Chaos-in-the-Alps-as-massive-snowfall-traps-15000-cars.html

    The thing of the past is now the thing of the present.

    • Ben Vorlich says:

      French ski operators re-learnt the lesson of becareful what you wish for. Just before Christmas every News item had long items on much the lack of snow was costing in lost revenue. Now they’re losing even more because there has been too much snow in a short period. Nature loves playing tricks on humans who think they know it all.

  10. ren says:

    “The temperature in the vortex center decreases with the increase of height and reaches its minimum at the levels 30-50 hPa (20-25 km).
    The temperature gradients at the vortex edges increase with height in the stratosphere starting from the level 150 hPa, their maximum being observed at the levels 50-10 hPa (20-30 km). In the troposphere temperature gradients are maximal near surface corresponding to Arctic fronts separating the Arctic air from warmer air of middle latitudes.
    Thus, the vortex is most pronounced at the 50-30 hPa levels where the minimum of
    stratospheric temperatures and the maximum of temperature gradients at its edges are observed. We can see that the highest values of ion production rate due to GCR are observed in the lower part of the vortex (10-15 km) where temperature gradients start increasing.
    On the other hand, the 11-year modulation of GCR fluxes is strongest at the heights 20-25 km [Bazilevskaya et al., 2008] where the vortex is most pronounced.
    Hence, the vortex location seems to be favorable for the mechanisms of solar activity influence on the atmosphere circulation involving GCR variations. It is also favorable for the mechanisms involving solar UV variations, as at these heights (15-25 km) in the polar stratosphere the maximum ozone content is observed.
    The evolution of the vortex is known to be determined by dynamic coupling between the troposphere and stratosphere via planetary wave propagation, as well as by radiation processes in the stratosphere. So, we can suggest that the mechanism of SA/GCR influence on the troposphere circulation involves changes of the vortex strength associated with changes of the heat-radiation balance in the stratosphere. These changes may be caused by variations of atmosphere transparency in visible and infrared range associated with the effects
    of ionization and atmospheric electricity variations on cloudy and aerosol particle characteristics [Tinsley, 2008]. Indeed, a considerable increase of aerosol concentration at high latitudes which was most pronounced at the heights 10-12 km and accompanied by the temperature decrease in overlying stratospheric layers was detected during a series of powerful solar proton events on January 15-20, 2005 [Veretenenko et al., 2008].
    In turn, the increase of the vortex strength intensifies temperature gradients at its edges (see Fig.4). At the stages of a strong vortex this increase of temperature gradients may be transferred to the troposphere via planetary waves and contribute to the increase of temperature contrasts in tropospheric frontal zones and the intensification of extratropical cyclogenesis.”
    http://oi61.tinypic.com/2btfdz.jpg
    http://geo.phys.spbu.ru/materials_of_a_conference_2012/STP2012/Veretenenko_%20et_all_Geocosmos2012proceedings.pdf
    http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/stratosphere/strat_a_f/gif_files/gfs_z100_nh_f00.gif
    15 km stratosphere

  11. au1corsair says:

    Big Brother demands that you believe hot is Global Warming and cold is Global Warming and “just right” is still Global Warming. Deny and get called names!

  12. ren says:

    Let’s see the oceans temperature anomalies. Clearly, the higher the temperature at North America follows to the constant air circulation.
    http://weather.gc.ca/data/saisons/images_loop/2014122800_054_G6_global_I_SEASON_tm@lg@sd_000.png
    http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/stratosphere/strat_a_f/gif_files/gfs_z70_nh_f00.gif
    Therefore, the high temperature of the ocean has little effect on the temperature in the United States.

    • Ernest Bush says:

      Right now, the higher temperature seems to be pumping more moisture into the Arctic chill. There is a lot of snow in the middle and north of the country. In some places its record breaking.

  13. R. Shearer says:

    If the forecast is correct, Boulder. Colorado will break the low temperature high for the date on Tuesday and be within 1 degree of the all time low.

  14. Robertv says:

    Does anyone know where Al Gore is currently celebrating his holiday?

    • ren says:

      “The coldest day looks to be New Year’s Eve where high temperatures may not make it into the 20s. Low temperatures will drop into the teens and perhaps even the single digits in the suburbs of Chicago.
      “Not only will the temperature be rather cold on New Year’s Eve, but gusty winds will make it feel much colder during the day and night,” said AccuWeather.com Meteorologist Tyler Roys.”

    • mjc says:

      Not where he should be…but then again, I think you need to be dead to be there.

  15. ren says:

    GCR cosmic ray spikes (in inverse relation to the magnetic activity of the sun).
    http://oi59.tinypic.com/rgz8up.jpg

  16. rah says:

    Claimed reason another type of “bomb” is falsified. Increased pollen count in Texas not due to cooler wetter conditions as claimed. http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/01/austins_pollen_bomb_and_climate_change_bunkum.html

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *