Even with Gavin’s best cheating, temperatures are far below 1990 IPCC scenario D
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on Perfect Correlation
- Gw on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Disillusioned on Elon’s Hockey Stick
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
- spren on “Climate dread is everywhere”
- spren on “Earlier Than Usual”
- czechlist on “Earlier Than Usual”
- conrad ziefle on Perfect Correlation
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hF3Q6op0e4
It should also be noted that CO2 emissions have been far higher than the BAU scenario presented in the 1990 IPCC report. For example, it was assumed we wouldn’t reach 10GtCO2/yr until 2020-2025 from a 1.5-2ppm/yr growth rate. We hit that mark this year and CO2 accumulation in the atmosphere has been roughly 2.5ppm/yr.
So reality of emissions is WORSE than the BAU scenario but reality of temperatures is LESS than the 100% phase out of carbon by 2000.
Taking the numbers of the graph and the GISS ‘adjusted’ data the earth is still ~0.6 degrees cooler than predicted for business as usual.
Consider the building of Coal plants in India, China and other third world countries has greatly expanded thanks to the World Bank (20% US tax payer financed) lending programs the CO2 output should be higher than ‘business as usual’
The World Bank released a very inflammatory document screaming about the dangers of CAGW: The World Bank 4 degree report in full here and summary for policymakers here.
But was then caught with it’s pants down:
http://co2scorecard.org/Content/uploads/WB_Exhibit_1.jpg
Sorry as usual the damaging documents have been ‘disappeared’
WUWT has a discussion of the report:
When bankers turn climatologists
With bankers, all you have to do is follow the money! 🙂
They follow their own tails.
Wow, that’s interesting — it’s the same verbiage as Hansen’s 1988 presentation to Congress. More evidence (as if any was needed) that modellers used Scenario A as a prediction for what would happen if emissions rose exactly the way they actually did.
Gavin needs to get to work, pronto!
Is that orange squiggle line supposed to be a temperature record? or an ‘anomaly’ of a temperature record? serious question.
It is GISS so it is a messaged, mutilated and adjusted ‘anomaly’ of the temperature record after all the rural stations have been deleted.
Even with all their contortions they still could not get an ‘anomaly’ of the temperature record to agree with their predictions.
That is why they booted Hansen and brought in a mathematician (Gavin Schmidt) to wrestle the data into compliance. So far he has managed to get 2014 to be the WARMEST YEAR EVAHHhhh. Mean while Hansen is free for lectures and protests.
Actually, he’s anything but free…I heard he’s a rather costly to bring in for a lecture.
It obviously must be a tortured piece of data. unbelievable!