Check out the latest from the crooks at NOAA
Instead of talking about the return to just below the post-1979 mean, they spin an event from last summer.
But it is much worse than it seems. NOAA claims that the satellite record began in 1979, but IPCC FAR and SAR said that NOAA has satellite data back to 1973 – when extent was much lower than 1979.
These dishonest government agencies are a cancer on our nation.
Tony, is there a link for those charts? Much thanks for all your work. They speak very nastily about you on DTT dot com whenever I bring up your excellent work. Couple of real meatheads over there. Maybe Gail would like to show up at DTT and help out. How about it Gail, if you have the time.
The data comes from Cavalieri 2003 (published in 2003 but the data was made available earlier).
http://climate.envsci.rutgers.edu/pdf/Cavalieri2003GL018031.pdf
This was the original NasaTeam sea ice algorithm (two authors from NASA Goodard flight centre) which is still used today in various sea ice datasets. They matched up the data available from various satellites starting with the Nimbus series in 1972 and 1973.
Daily and monthly data available here,
ftp://sidads.colorado.edu/DATASETS/nsidc0192_seaice_trends_climo/total-ice-area-extent/esmr-smmr-ssmi-merged/
Don, I am not sure who you are talking about.
“DTT is a full-service provider of surveillance systems and loss prevention solutions for the hospitality and retail industries.” ????
That particular figure was from assessment of WG1, IPCC, 1995 on page 150. http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sar/wg_I/ipcc_sar_wg_I_full_report.pdf
Thanks, Steven, for your direct way of confronting government fraudsters.
The fraud will end when the peoples’ representatives in formerly national governments are able to answer direct questions, like “Why Did Our Government Deceive Us?”
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/WHY.pdf
I suspect they cannot answer because a newly created international form of government – the United Nations was established on 24 Oct 1945 – made the decision to deceive the public in order to save the world from nuclear annihilation.
Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
It’s even worse than caner at least when you have it you know you have it. Withe NASA and NOAA how many really even know what is being done with the data they collect to make it seem to be something that it isn’t?
Government-funded scientists deceived the public for sixty-nine years (2014 – 1945 = 69 yrs) about astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, nuclear, particle, planetary, solar and theoretical physics.
The arrogance of success blinded them into believing they could also deceive the public about weather and climate.
They’re getting cornered and it hurts 😉
The Global Climate Status Report (GCSR)
Summary Climate Assessment
December 10, 2014
Summary Climate Assessment
After a thorough review of the selected climate status parameters up through December 10, 2014,
the current summary climate assessment and prediction for the Earth’s climate future are as
follows:
1. Current Climate Status.
a. Overall Climate Status. The Earth is presently in a sustained phase of GLOBAL
COOLING though moderated by recently past peak of solar heating during solar cycle #24.
Though there is new evidence of a reduction in this rate during the 2013-2014 period, the rate of
temperature decline on a 100 year trend line is the steepest seen during that time frame going
back to 1914. We conclude that the past period of global warming, as a natural phase of climate
variation caused by the Sun, has ended, and a new cold climate epoch has begun.
b. Two Hundred Year Solar Cycle Continues to Dominate Global Climate. The most
recent multi-centennial climate epoch which began around 1830, has begun to reverse direction
from a global temperature standpoint. The past period of generally increasing warmth for the
Earth, which was caused by the Sun’s natural and regular cycles of activity, reached an average
peak of warming between 2007 and 2008 as measured by global atmospheric temperatures in the
lower troposphere. This change was observed in oceanic temperatures as early as 2003. Acting
primarily under the influence of a repeating 206 year solar cycle, a new “solar hibernation” has
begun, and is marked by a significant decline in the Sun’s energy output. Starting with solar
cycle #24, this energy reduction has initiated an expected reversal from the past warm era to a
new cold era.
c. Near Term Trends. Major features of the Earth’s current climate status include the
following sustained trends:
(1) There has been no effective growth in global temperature for eighteen (18) years.
Temperatures in the lower troposphere have temporarily stabilized from a previously declining
short term trend because of 2013-2014 warming. This trend is expected to revert to COOLING in
the next year or two.
(2) Integrated Global Atmospheric and Oceanic Temperatures have stabilized in part
because of the heating from the peak of solar cycle #24.
(3) Substantial flux among climate parameters is evident in the ongoing destabilization in
climate trends during the transition from the past period of global warming to the new cold
climate.
(4) Polar regions have now displayed a consistent trend of colder temperatures and growth
in sea ice.
2. Climate Prediction for the Next Thirty Years.
Based on the SSRC’s Relational Cycle Theory (RC Theory) using natural cycles as a means for
climate prediction and in view of the trends demonstrated by the twenty four global climate
parameters, the following climate prediction is believed to be the most accurate available for the
period of 2015 to 2044:
a. Highly variable and extreme weather events are expected during the transition from the past
warm period to one of rapid global cooling.
b. This next climate change to a long and deep cold era is expected to last for at least the next
thirty to forty years.
c. The extent and depth of the cold weather produced in this new climate era is estimated to be
the worst in over two hundred years producing a global temperature reduction of 1.0 to 1.5
degrees centigrade.
3. Likely Future Climate Scenarios.
The SSRC believes existing climate change indicators support the assessment that a new
potentially dangerous cold climate age has begun. It should be emphasized that unless a
significant unexpected and rapid change in the present declining solar activity trend occurs, there
are only two climate scenarios that appear likely at this time over the next forty years. Each
scenario results in a new cold climate era:
a. Scenario 1. A solar hibernation similar to the Dalton Minimum (1793-1830). This would
result in routine establishment of new 200 year cold weather records.
b. Scenario 2. A solar hibernation similar to the one during the Maunder Minimum (1615-
1745). A climate period like this would see 400 year temperature records and widespread climate
and weather extremes.
c. Human Impacts. A review of the history from these periods shows they were marked by
significant increases in cold weather deaths, starvation through global crop losses, livestock
losses, and loss of life through concurrent civil unrest, warfare and disease. Record cold effects
of the current hibernation are already being felt and instances of crop damage may occur at any
time. During that past Dalton era the crop damage was so severe that one US historian has called
the period mankind’s “…greatest subsistence crisis.” Both scenarios for the Earth’s climate
future are likely to result in substantial, global, social disruption and loss of life. The difference
will be one of degree.
d. Increased Geophysical Activity. Further, the SSRC and other researchers have determined
that there exists a strong correlation between solar hibernations and the largest recorded
earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. Large volcanic eruptions (Volcanic Explosive Index of 6+)
may exacerbate the ongoing transition to a new cold climate epoch through augmented aerosol
and dust shielding and reflection of incoming solar radiation. This correlation was examined in
detail in a scientific paper in edition 2-3014 of the GCSR, dated June 10, 2014.
4. New Climate Predictions (from SSRC Press Release 4-2014).
a. The Earth is about to begin a steep drop in global temperatures. The analysis of the level and
variability of sunspots in the current solar cycle 24, including the warming of atmospheric
temperatures between 2013 and 2014 indicates that the Earth is following a climate change
path similar to solar cycle 5, during the last 206 year solar cycle driven solar hibernation.
b. Average global atmospheric and oceanic temperatures will drop significantly beginning
between 2015 and 2016.
c. The predicted temperature decline will continue for the next fifteen years and likely will be
the steepest ever recorded in human history discounting past short term volcanic events.
d. Global average temperatures during the 2030’s will reach a level of 1-1.5°C lower than the
peak year of 1998.
The Space and Science Research Corporation grants unrestricted use of this Summary
Climate Assessment for reproduction or transmission to others either in total or any portion
thereof.
Please feel free to pass this on to others you believe may be interested in the Global Climate Status Report.
Thank You,
John L. Casey
President
Space and Science Research Corporation
Editor, Global Climate Status Report
The 88 year period and the 200 year period are known:
NASA Finds Sun-Climate Connection in Old Nile Records
The American Geophysical Union scrubbed their copy of Feynman’s paper from their website.
(wwwDOT)agu.org/pubs/crossref/2006/2006JD007462.shtml
The paper: Is solar variability reflected in the Nile River?
Another paper: Extreme Nile floods and famines in Medieval Egypt (AD 930–1500) and their climatic implications
Fekri A. Hassan
Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31-34 Gordon Square, WC1H 0PY, London, UK
Japan is getting plastered again.
Hokkaido already has 2 feet of snow on the ground with a total of four feet expected by noon tommorow.
On December fourth the city of Nayoro was buried in 70 cm (27 inches) of snow, 40 cm (16 inches) in Otaru. 86 centimeters in Kamikawa….
By December 7, Six people were dead, over a hundred vehicles trapped in snow, 20,000 homes were without electricity. and 1,200 people cut off by fallen trees and such. 116 cm (4 feet) of snow had fallen in the Sukayu area of Aomori Prefecture, 97 cm in the village of Okura in Yamagata Prefecture and 90 cm in the village of Shirakawa in Gifu Prefecture, the Japan Meteorological Agency said.
By December 9th the death toll had risen to eight people.
On December 15th Japan was again hit with snow.
As that report said, Japan got more than its fair share of snow last winter too. Some how I think the Japanese have had enough ‘Global Warming’ and it is not even winter yet.
Blast,
That newest snow storm in Japan has already left three people dead.
http://newsonjapan.com/html/newsdesk/article/110699.php
These fools talk of “Global Warming’ on their high priced junkets while real people die from the cold and snow…. GRRRrrrrrr.
South Korea is also getting hit with heavy snow (8 inches in Seoul – lat 37.5° N) There is no way of knowing what the weather is in North Korea or the effect on the people but it can not be good.
In North Korea they are snowed in and to take up their time they launched and won a cyber-war with the United States. Imagine what they will do when N.hemisphere winter actually starts!
Above: “They speak very nastily about you on DTT dot com whenever I bring up your excellent work. ” Great its working SG keep it up. The only site REALLY hurting the AGW institutions severely
+1
I didn’t bother to read the article, the leading photo was enough amusement for me:
http://dailydigestnews.com/2014/12/as-warming-for-the-rest-of-earth-slows-heat-somehow-doubles-in-the-arctic/
Reblogged this on Climatism.
Re Fraud: fraud is telling lies to make money. And yes I agree, these government agencies & academics do tell lies and they clearly make money from it.
But what I find astonishing, is that they just don’t seem to understand that this is a criminal offence. They seem to believe they are above the law and that somehow the law only applies to people outside government & academia. It doesn’t.
Personally, when the temperatures drop sufficient to show this whole scam was bogus, I will be taking action to recover the £1000s money our family will have paid out as a result of this fraudulent advice from various government agencies and academics.
They will then claim the law doesn’t apply to them, that they were and are above the law. But they will find they are not. And with so many people globally who have lost out, it will bankrupt almost every academic who ever offered any advice and their universities and e.g. the US taxpayer will be asked to compensate other countries for the advice they got from NOAA.
If you thought the climate wars were acrimonious – just imagine what the compensation wars will look like!
Scottish Sceptic,
I wish you were correct but at least in the USA you will get nowhere. Look at the clear case of criminal activity by Peter Gleick In 2012 Gleick Confessed to Obtaining Heartland Documents Under False Pretenses and “….risk a wire-fraud conviction, the destruction of your career, and a serious PR blow to your movement by impersonating a Heartland board member in order to obtain confidential documents….”
What was the result? The prosecutor refused to prosecute Gleick, but the AGU quickly removed him as their Chair of the Ethics Task Force. Yet During the Convention the next year Gleick was not only present but was HONORED by being allowed to give a presentation.
And the AGU’s work on ethics??? Steve McIntyre, on
Jan 5, 2013 tells us in his post entitled AGU Honors Gleick
This is the type of response I expect. NOTHING. After all we already have a One Hundred Year history of the elite getting off without even a hand slap after repeated cases of fraud.
In a landmark Minnesota case, First National Bank of Montgomery vs. Daly (1969)
Of course no such thing happened. The Judge “died less than six months after the trial, in a mysterious accident that appeared to involve poisoning.” (Congressman McFadden after targeting the Federal Reserve System also died of poisoning after being shot at twice.)
The Elite are truly above the law. They can get away with theft, fraud, rape, murder and nothing will be done. You only have to look at Mary Jo Kopechne’s death (July 18, 1969) at the hands of U.S. Senator Edward “Ted” Kennedy. A few years ago I had the chance to talk to the first policeman on scene’s daughter. Yes Mary Jo was pregnant and yes everyone was bought off and the whole mess covered up. Kennedy continued to be elected Senator up to the time of his death August 25, 2009. So much for justice.
Or look at the clear case of TRE@SON in which nothing has been done despite the fact our country has been enormously harmed. Clinton: Chasing the Dragon or Clinton’s China Scandals
The repercussions of what Clinton did will be felt through out the world for generations to come. We will be darn lucky if we do not end up in war.
Goes to show you the stupidity of the Tax-a-2-shits population. Latest example, Elizabeth Warren.
It’s been said that the real reason JFK was killed was because he was also challenging the Federal Reserve System. He had the Treasury issue US Treasury Notes; in an effort to limit the Fed’s power in monetary policy ?
Kent Clizbe in his book indicated that John and Bobby had finally figured out that they were being manipulated by Bobby’s KGB handler.
The Cuban Missile Crisis was in October 1962. John’s assassination was November 22, 1963. And Bobby, June 6, 1968 when he made a bid for president.
How connected the Banksters and the Communists were at the time I do not know. But the Banksters certainly financed the Communist Revolution in Russia and the privately held company Cargill was busy supplying Russia with American grain throughout the cold war and during the US grain embargo.
http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/34274/robert-l-paarlberg/lessons-of-the-grain-embargo
One wonders, Gail, how much more ‘fabricated’ and ‘spun’ material you so effortlessly post is 100% absolutely untrue?
Fact checking – What’s that? Never mind the ‘facts’, eh Gail, when you have *important* points to make?
re: Gail Combs says December 18, 2014 at 2:28 pm
First off, GREAT job of coat-racking and attempting to solve ALL mankind’s ills in one post Gail; that was hair-on-fire posting at its finest.
Secondly, the case First National Bank of Montgomery vs. Daly (1969) is a fave among conspiracy theorists for several decades now, and very rarely are the facts of the case examined (just the same old selective edits from the CTs).
Best to review the facts of this case vs the same old hyperbole repeated ad infinitum:
http://mn.gov/lawlib/creditriver.html
OH GOOODY! _Jim is finally back to take his usual potshots. And WOW! for once he actually provides a LINK!!!
History in the making folks!
BTW Ellen Brown who wrote the article I quoted above is an attorney who specialised in civil litigation in Los Angeles.
On the other hand _Jim is the guy who has spend the last several years on WUWT defending the Federal Reserve, Fractional Reserve banking and trashing Mises.
He also called me nuts for what I said about UN Agenda 21…. Until I rubbed his nose in direct quotes from the UN.
And when I mention ” In group settings, the Delphi Technique is an unethical method of achieving consensus on controversial topics. “ A method that is not only mentioned by the farming community dealing with the USDA back several years ago link but is also identified by California government employee Rosa Koire at her local town meetings: Near Riot at Delphi Meeting Part I
Turning the tables on a government indoctrination meeting. We will not be Good Germans. The result of our action was that they were unable to hold their phony ‘vote’ in a meeting room packed with shills and insiders.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vA4GKUUxkhA
We get from Trojan Horse _Jim:
Way to go _Jim I bet your masters were real proud of that lie.
THE SANTA ROSA NEIGHBORHOOD COALITION
ARE YOU BEING DELPHI’ED? DO YOU FEEL MANIPULATED IN GROUP MEETINGS?
The Delphi Technique: WHAT IT IS AND WHY YOU SHOULD CARE
“The goal of the Delphi technique is to lead a targeted group of people to a predetermined outcome, while giving the illusion of taking public input and under the pretext of being accountable to the public.”
The Rand Corporation in the early 1960s developed the Delphi technique for the purpose of maneuvering segments of the public into accepting predetermined government policies. In the 1970s and ’80s, it was used to convince land owners of the merits of accepting general plan maps. It now is being employed by the City of Santa Rosa and local groups working with the City in order to engineer “citizen consent.”
(wwwDOT)santarosaneighborhoodcoalition.com/delphi.html
So _Jim, When are you going to change your name to TROJAN HORSE _JIM?
Re: The NON-landmark Minnesota case, First National Bank of Montgomery vs. Daly (1969) also known as the Credit River Case, the following is condensed from a statement at the Minnesota State Law Library web site:
1) The Credit River decision was not legal precedent as it was undertaken by a justice of the peace (and out of his Subject-matter jurisdiction).
2) The case was eventually overruled by other court decisions.
3) The defendant, Jerome Daly, was a longtime tax protester and attorney who was later disbarred by a decision of the Minnesota Supreme Court.
Of course, facts don’t matter so much to Gail on some issues as others, as long as the cite she is quoting supports whatever thesis she is ‘on’ about at that moment.
.
Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals
RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.
RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.
Notice how _Jim completely ignores the critical point. The money lent by banks is printed out of nothing and therefore the contract is null and void because there is no consideration.
Instead _Jim attacks me and attacks Daley and attacks Justice Martin V. Mahoney.
Of note:
There was no mistrial
The appeal by the bank was turned down
A friend used the same point. NO CONSIDERATION to win in his suit against Manufacturers Hanover Trust a few years ago.
And Ronnie Reagan, the week he left office, ran off to Japan to collect a multi-million dollar bribe in the form of an addled speech which the Japanese didn’t bother to even try to understand.
They did get their one-way trade for it! They were happy.
Tony, the world did not exist prior to 1979 – that is the new meme.
“These dishonest government agencies are a cancer on our nation.”
Jeb Bush is metastasizing as we speak.
how typical…..
Seems the Elite want Hitlery for our next president….
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/03/gop_establishment_turns_to_jeb_bush.html
Too bad a third party in the USA is not viable at this time.
A second Party might be useful pro tem……
Not in the USA since we only have two major parties who split the vote pretty much down the middle.
It is working in the UK since they have three major parties as well as several minor.
I thought they were in love with Jeb? Elizabeth Warren is being anointed by The O so maybe she is the next one … she is also very anti big-bank.
Sure she’s anti big-bank; she wants to nationalize them.
So was Obama when he was just a Candidate.
It worked, did it not? $994,795 in Goldman Sachs money alone in 07-08. It’s the Jackson/Sharpton business model.
Jeb/Hillary for Prez! Really. How many differences are there between the two? You choose who’s on top.
I wish I’d never read that.
As you know, the three times it was attempted, the consequences to our nation and our liberty have been dire, and we continue to suffer from the results.
If the Republicans do nothing else with their huge majorities in Congress, they should defund these agencies that are nothing but propaganda tools for the highly political “climate change” lobby.
Fat chance. The Ds are hard core Marxists. The R establishment is soft core Marxist. The transformation of America began, in earnest, in the 1890s. By the 30s, it was essentially complete, with the short and only partially effective efforts of Harding/Coolidge and Reagan. Everything since then has been gilding the lily.
Old ways die hard and old times are not so easily forgotten, so the perps took the Long March path. Over a century it has been going on. From Dewey and the Roosevelts to the Bushes and O. there is a common thread.
@ slimething,
Heh, doesn’t she know that the banks were nationalized in 1913?
And I thought I was a cynic.
Unfortunately I have to agree with you. The plans to wipe out the USA and install a world wide system of serfdom ruled by the elite were made long long ago.
A good history:
http://www.eurocanadian.ca/2014/06/the-socialist-capitalist-alliance.html
More here: Revolution from Above By Kerry Bolton
The big problem has always been getting rid of those pesky things called the Constitution and individual freedom while hiding the true nature of the take over.
You have to admire what they have done. Convincing a lot of people they DESERVE to be POOR while turning a blind eye to the fact the ones telling them they should be poor are billionaires….
“If the Republicans do nothing “
It is not a question of If as long as Boehner is in charge.