Green shows ice growth since September 2012. Red shows ice loss.
Extent is 38% larger than the 2012 minimum. Extent will shrink some before mid-September, so the minimum coverage for 2015 will be a little lower than it is now.
Green shows ice growth since September 2012. Red shows ice loss.
Extent is 38% larger than the 2012 minimum. Extent will shrink some before mid-September, so the minimum coverage for 2015 will be a little lower than it is now.
O/T
Is the ‘blob’ of warm water of North America’s west coast finally moving off?
http://weather.gc.ca/saisons/animation_e.html?id=year&bc=sea
I’m sure they will will breath a huge sigh of relief and report that concerns about AGW have been overblown.
The human race, as well as the biosphere, benefits from more open water in the Arctic, not less. It’s time to remove the warmist blinders on this issue.
https://rclutz.wordpress.com/2015/08/20/seeing-the-arctic-melt-without-warmist-glasses/
The problem is that they have already portrayed ice loss as a disaster and as a key indication that their AGW hypothesis is correct since warming from CO2 is supposed to increase over the Arctic first.
I don’t think even they could flip flop off that claim successfully to keep the AGW scam alive.
Ironic isn’t it? If our fossil fuel emissions do a bit to postpone the next ice age, that is a good thing.
And I urge sceptics to refute the warmest premise, not expecting that consensus faithful will see the light.
Global sea ice is working on a 30-year low, though.
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/global.daily.ice.area.withtrend.jpg