New Video : Most Or All Of The Positives Are False

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to New Video : Most Or All Of The Positives Are False

  1. Brian James says:

    Thanks for all you do!

    September 19, 2020 COVID-19: Continuous Wearing of Mask Aggravates Risk of Infection. “Psychological Terrorism”?

    Studies have shown that the porosity (microscopic holes) of the masks allows exhaled germs to accumulate on the external surface of the mask. Not only do we re-inhale our own CO2, but by touching our mask all the time (an inevitable gesture), we spread germs everywhere!

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-19-continuous-wearing-of-mask-aggravates-the-risk-of-infection-psychological-terrorism/5719704

  2. Ulric Lyons says:

    Matt Hancock claims that less than 1% of Cov19 PCR tests are false positives.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEqm0ldWf-8

  3. Conrad Ziefle says:

    If I understand this, and it does make sense, false positive is a characteristic of the test and not a function of positive results found. So a certain test might have the characteristic of giving a false postive 1% of the time. So if 100,000 tests are given there will be about 1000 false positives. However, false positives are often stated as if they are a function of the subset of positive results. For example, if 100,000 tests are given and 5000 were positive, we would be told that there is a 20% that a positive is false. But that 20% depends on how prevalent the pathogen is in the community. If the pathogen is absent from the community then 100% of the positves are false. If the pathogen is widespread in the community then the fraction of false positives might be tiny. I think this article says that, but I don’t read medical jargon that well: https://www.aafp.org/afp/2020/0701/p5a.html

  4. D. Boss says:

    Everyone arguing that any sort of reliance on the PCR test for Covid “positive” tests is either ignorant or lying!

    https://principia-scientific.com/tests-positives-up-but-fewer-dead-end-the-lockdowns/

    The above link has further links to pertinent studies. And the inventor of the PCR test emphatically said the test is NOT suitable for any kind of diagnosis!

    It amplifies just a fragment of DNA or RNA millions of times. This CANNOT tell you if your immune system has destroyed the invader, and the test merely picks up the taking out of the trash fragments (ie you are not infected, hence asymptomatic), or you have a high viral load and your immune system is loosing the battle and are infected.

    Hence the numerous studies linked to above, show it is as bad as 80% false positive.

    There is no such thing as “superspreaders” or every 2nd or 10th person you see on the street being some kind of Typhoid Mary! This narrative that most of the infected don’t have symptoms is also hogwash – you are only infected if you get symptoms.

    The apparent huge numbers of asymptomatic people are the direct result of the false positive nature of the dumbass misuse of the PCR testing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *