“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness. As one participant put it, “poor methods get results”.”
Richard Horton – editor of The Lancet
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Elon Pushing Pushing Geoengineering
- Earth, Wind And Fire
- On The Road Again
- Vandalism At The Reflecting Pool
- Fifty Years Ago Today
- Truth Or Consequences
- US Climate Trend Maps
- Declining Spring Snow Cover In Northern New Mexico
- You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Cattle And The Climate
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Elon Pushing Pushing Geoengineering
- Dave A on US Climate Trend Maps
- John Francis on Elon Pushing Pushing Geoengineering
- John Francis on Elon Pushing Pushing Geoengineering
- conrad ziefle on Elon Pushing Pushing Geoengineering
- conrad ziefle on Elon Pushing Pushing Geoengineering
- Lonnie on Elon Pushing Pushing Geoengineering
- arn on Elon Pushing Pushing Geoengineering
- arn on Elon Pushing Pushing Geoengineering
- Luigi on Elon Pushing Pushing Geoengineering
