When their sea level rise predictions were failing, US government agencies simply moved the goalposts, and made up fake data.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Crashex on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Mike on Climate Scamming For Profit
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Francis Barnett on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Bob G on Time Of Observation Bias
- arn on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Crashex on Climate Scamming For Profit
Greta the Goblin’s home of Sweden, and Finland (and Norway too) are all DEN!ERS of US Govt ‘truth’ and UN ‘prophecy’ and Green ‘nightmares’. It could be a relic of their old Viking ways, or it could be a case of isostatic rebound, of which 97% of ‘climate justice’ activists have never heard of.
Maybe with the coming dark night of winter and the accompanying snowfall, Scandinavia may once again begin to slip beneath the ocean waves.
There is a change in the change of sea levels.
If You look at the 50 Year smoothed graph You will find this.
Here from Cuxhafen Germany:
https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?plot=50yr&id=140-012
The rise was bigger before but is increasing today.
Some of the gages have a dent in later time. Sidney is one example.
So look up for a mail stating: We have to control the gages 😉
The range resolution of a radar system is given by twice the swept bandwidth of the processing divided by the speed of light. Even in a broadband radar, the bandwidth cannot exceed the carrier frequency. So the best that can be done with a 1cm radar is 2cm resolution without introducing ambiguity. Greater accuracy (although not resolution) may be obtained if the range to the target is known roughly beforehand, and there are a number of techniques which can be used such as applying monopulse processing between the signal in two range gates that straddle the expected target position, but the resulting measurements are extremely noisy and need to be integrated over a significant period of time I don’t believe the results for one minute. For a start the satellite position is known in a stellar frame of reference rather than with respect to mean sea level, two reference frames which need to be aligned to less tan a millimetre. What a joke..
So sea level rise tripled starting in 1995. Was that because atmospheric CO2 also tripled in 1995? We know that CO2 drives sea level rise, so that would require the same dramatic increase, wouldn’t it?
Oops, my bad. The Mona Loa CO2 concentration graph shows no such blip in 1995, or ever. Never mind!
Thanks Tony.
Excellent, as usual.
nice article on zerohedge.com addressing the climate change hoax. https://www.zerohedge.com/weather/msm-journos-inadvertently-reveal-shocking-truth-about-global-warming