When their sea level rise predictions were failing, US government agencies simply moved the goalposts, and made up fake data.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
- The Origins Of Modern Climate Science
- If An Academic Said It, It Must Be True
- Record Snow Cover
- Stopping Climate Misinformation
- Arctic Ice Free In Two Years
- “Decades Of Scientific Research”
- The Atlantic : Tesla Bombings Not Politics Or Terrorism
- Tough Times For Eco-Terrorists
- EV Mandates
- “Oswald is a patsy. They set him up”
- In This House We Believe In Science
- “BEAUTIFUL, CLEAN COAL”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Net Zero In China
- Bob G on Net Zero In China
- conrad ziefle on Net Zero In China
- william on Make America Healthy Again
- arn on Make America Healthy Again
- Gerald Machnee on Grok Defending Climategate
- dearieme on Nobel Prophecy Update
- Russell Cook on Make America Healthy Again
- Allan Shelton on Make America Healthy Again
- Bill Odom on Net Zero In China
Greta the Goblin’s home of Sweden, and Finland (and Norway too) are all DEN!ERS of US Govt ‘truth’ and UN ‘prophecy’ and Green ‘nightmares’. It could be a relic of their old Viking ways, or it could be a case of isostatic rebound, of which 97% of ‘climate justice’ activists have never heard of.
Maybe with the coming dark night of winter and the accompanying snowfall, Scandinavia may once again begin to slip beneath the ocean waves.
There is a change in the change of sea levels.
If You look at the 50 Year smoothed graph You will find this.
Here from Cuxhafen Germany:
https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?plot=50yr&id=140-012
The rise was bigger before but is increasing today.
Some of the gages have a dent in later time. Sidney is one example.
So look up for a mail stating: We have to control the gages 😉
The range resolution of a radar system is given by twice the swept bandwidth of the processing divided by the speed of light. Even in a broadband radar, the bandwidth cannot exceed the carrier frequency. So the best that can be done with a 1cm radar is 2cm resolution without introducing ambiguity. Greater accuracy (although not resolution) may be obtained if the range to the target is known roughly beforehand, and there are a number of techniques which can be used such as applying monopulse processing between the signal in two range gates that straddle the expected target position, but the resulting measurements are extremely noisy and need to be integrated over a significant period of time I don’t believe the results for one minute. For a start the satellite position is known in a stellar frame of reference rather than with respect to mean sea level, two reference frames which need to be aligned to less tan a millimetre. What a joke..
So sea level rise tripled starting in 1995. Was that because atmospheric CO2 also tripled in 1995? We know that CO2 drives sea level rise, so that would require the same dramatic increase, wouldn’t it?
Oops, my bad. The Mona Loa CO2 concentration graph shows no such blip in 1995, or ever. Never mind!
Thanks Tony.
Excellent, as usual.
nice article on zerohedge.com addressing the climate change hoax. https://www.zerohedge.com/weather/msm-journos-inadvertently-reveal-shocking-truth-about-global-warming