When their sea level rise predictions were failing, US government agencies simply moved the goalposts, and made up fake data.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Latest Research In Climate Science
- UK Sucking Carbon
- Price-Free Tesla
- Four Years Past The Deadline
- Cooling Minnesota
- UK Net Zero
- Erasing 1921
- “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Warming Toledo
- One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Cold Hurricanes
- Plant Food
- President Trump Gets Every Question Right
- The Inflation Reduction Act
- Saving The Ecosystem
- Two Weeks Past The End Of The World
- Desperate State Of The Cryosphere
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
- More Proof Of Global Warming
Recent Comments
- gordon vigurs on Latest Research In Climate Science
- gordon vigurs on UK Sucking Carbon
- Bob G on Latest Research In Climate Science
- Tel on Latest Research In Climate Science
- Tel on UK Sucking Carbon
- william on One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Bob G on UK Net Zero
- arn on One Year Left To Save The Planet
- conrad ziefle on One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Ulric Lyons on Erasing 1921
Greta the Goblin’s home of Sweden, and Finland (and Norway too) are all DEN!ERS of US Govt ‘truth’ and UN ‘prophecy’ and Green ‘nightmares’. It could be a relic of their old Viking ways, or it could be a case of isostatic rebound, of which 97% of ‘climate justice’ activists have never heard of.
Maybe with the coming dark night of winter and the accompanying snowfall, Scandinavia may once again begin to slip beneath the ocean waves.
There is a change in the change of sea levels.
If You look at the 50 Year smoothed graph You will find this.
Here from Cuxhafen Germany:
https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?plot=50yr&id=140-012
The rise was bigger before but is increasing today.
Some of the gages have a dent in later time. Sidney is one example.
So look up for a mail stating: We have to control the gages 😉
The range resolution of a radar system is given by twice the swept bandwidth of the processing divided by the speed of light. Even in a broadband radar, the bandwidth cannot exceed the carrier frequency. So the best that can be done with a 1cm radar is 2cm resolution without introducing ambiguity. Greater accuracy (although not resolution) may be obtained if the range to the target is known roughly beforehand, and there are a number of techniques which can be used such as applying monopulse processing between the signal in two range gates that straddle the expected target position, but the resulting measurements are extremely noisy and need to be integrated over a significant period of time I don’t believe the results for one minute. For a start the satellite position is known in a stellar frame of reference rather than with respect to mean sea level, two reference frames which need to be aligned to less tan a millimetre. What a joke..
So sea level rise tripled starting in 1995. Was that because atmospheric CO2 also tripled in 1995? We know that CO2 drives sea level rise, so that would require the same dramatic increase, wouldn’t it?
Oops, my bad. The Mona Loa CO2 concentration graph shows no such blip in 1995, or ever. Never mind!
Thanks Tony.
Excellent, as usual.
nice article on zerohedge.com addressing the climate change hoax. https://www.zerohedge.com/weather/msm-journos-inadvertently-reveal-shocking-truth-about-global-warming