With temperatures below 0F (-18C), Northern Colorado is only getting 3% of their electricity from wind.
“Platte River Power Authority is committed to working toward achieving a 100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- 1970 – The Beginning Of Time
- Hiding The Heat Of 1934
- ‘malice toward the planet’
- Final Score For The Inflation Reduction Act
- Fraudster Fighting Climate Misinformation
- Ice Free Glacier National Park
- Climate Comedy Cancelled
- Warmest March On Record
- New Climate Metric
- Bad-Faith Trial Misconduct
- Food And Energy Experts
- “Are We Imagining It?”
- The Suffragettes
- Michael Mann Upset
- A Serious Problem
- Miami Drowning
- No Longer The Greatest Existential Threat
- Almost Unanimous Consensus Of Scientists
- Maryland To Drown
- Rapid Virus Mutation
- Wisconsin To Save The Planet
- Magical Musk
- “Scientists Forecast”
- “thing of the past” update
- Defunding The Climate Scam
Recent Comments
- Ulric Lyons on Hiding The Heat Of 1934
- arn on New Climate Metric
- william on New Climate Metric
- Alastair on Fraudster Fighting Climate Misinformation
- arn on New Climate Metric
- arn on ‘malice toward the planet’
- Bob G on Fraudster Fighting Climate Misinformation
- dearieme on Fraudster Fighting Climate Misinformation
- Mike Peinsipp on Final Score For The Inflation Reduction Act
- Billyjack on Ice Free Glacier National Park
I’m surprised it’s as high as 3%. I was told by the manager of a rural co-op power company that when the temperature reaches 20 below the wind turbines cannot be used and in fact they actually draw electricity because they need to be heated at that point. Bottom line when you need them the most you can’t use them. pretty much all of North Dakota and the northern half of Minnesota was colder than 20 below this morning.
COLDER??? Hell it was MINUS 20!
Heck here in KY we have rain. North Central KY got 6″ snow.
This winter in KY has been cold & rainy/snowy. Well Mother’s Nature & Father Sun control out Climate so hopefully these two start getting along with each other again…maybe Summer
Seems obvious that noncarbon is warfare against the own population
to get rid of human carbon.
It was way more hoenest before they replaced red with green,
Historically, if we have a history, the Antiocarbon religion will go down as the most mindlessly fanatical since the Inquisitions (or Islam in general).
Let’s not fogret our friends from our atheist religion of Communism (though some claim that climatists are just a continuncy of it under a different name).
And the cruel joke is that Islam (is as dangerous in a man as rabis in a dog – Churchill),
Islam is the least dangerous of this trinity , because it is the most hoenest/obvious and the easiest to decode.
Climatists and communists don’t take their cars and speed into a crowd to hurt 30 people as happened today in Munich.
They starve you to death and rarely ever use the direct approach.
That’s why the Jim Crow democrats were not even 10% as effective as today democrats are.
Back then people knew who the enemy was.
They’re not environmentalists, they’re the angels of darkness. They want to suck enough carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere to kill all life on Earth. At this point, they only have to get rid of half of it to be there.
I noticed purchases is 37.6 percent. I wounded what the breakdown of purchases. Coal?
Purchases are buying power from other states.
0% nuclear.
Nuclear is reliable and would solve many problems.
Therefore it is not an option as it would stop desindustrialisation = depopulation.
Just last month crazy German Supermegaexpert Rahmstorf posted
that more nuclear power plants will increase global warming as result of waste heat.
Considering how many more magnitudes of magnitudes of heat the earth gets from the sun compared to nuclear waste heat his argument is really really special ; even by woke standards.(and no – he is not demented, but most probably went to the wrong party)
It seems that all kind of heat mankind produces will stay on earth
forever.
I recall doing the calculation on the effect of waste heat, I think it came to about 1 degree rise if the number of thermal power stations (nuclear and fossil fuel) were to increase one hundred times their current level. Not a major concern.
Nice to get this from someone with the necessary background.
This means that going from current global 9% to 100% nuclear would increase the global temperature by an apocalyptic 0.11 degrees.
Industry leading thermapen one has a 0.5 degree accuracy while the WMO claims to have a global temperature accuracy of 0.13 degrees( I doubt that somehow.Especially in an adjustment ridden space) .
Maybe one day we will have the technology to measure an inexistent increase of 0.11.
You can kind of guess this without using any math: Is something creating heat that normally wouldn’t be doing anything? We assume that nuclear fission would not be happening without humans making it happen. Ditto burning fossil fuels. So yes, it is increasing heat and waste heat. Is it significant? Now you need to do the math. You would also make the assumptions about how the world as we know it would function if we weren’t here. Maybe entire regions would burn up periodically, without human fire control. Maybe entire regions would dry up and blow away, without human water management, etc.
its the same- GE & others are making BILLIONS on Wind & solar so they will continue to pay for propaganda and politicians