Buffalo, NY meteorologist Don Paul predicted a warm winter, based on global warming propaganda.
He didn’t like me pointing out his bad forecast.
His response reminds me of Meat Loaf.
Don used the same jet stream diagram to explain global warming, as Science News used fifty years ago to explain global cooling.
00368423.ap071683.07a00180.pdf
Just as experts predicted, Florida may be snow-free next week.
Dear Tony, the man-made global warming congregation has very thin skin, you don’t want to tick them off. Signed, Mark Steyn. lol. Bob G. reporting from South Central Minnesota tonight, it’s now seven below. A cold snap is nothing new for us, but this one looks like it’s going to last 10 days or more. ouch!
I probably won’t win a Nobel prize for this theory but…. if the wind blows from the north it’s going to be colder than average. if the wind blows from the south it’s going to be warmer than average. conclusion…. if 55% of the days in a given year give you southernly winds you’re going to have a warm year. the opposite gives you a cold year. makes more sense to me than a trace gas controlling the climate. now where is my Nobel prize?!?!?!
????????It is on the way WINNER!
Wait till they learn that Eddy of the Eddy Minimum is controlling Earths temps.
In real science, a single counter example disproves the theory. What Don Paul is peddling is astrology.
If they really understood the polar vortex then they would tell us months in advance when we would have warm or cold weather. I’m just curious as to what % of the time the vortex spins in laminar flow, and what part of the time does it chop up into the “turbulent” mode? Is there truly a steady state for the system?- It seems that both states are “normal”, meaning not infrequent, even if one of them is more prevalent.
He can be right for two seasons, simply because random walk was with him for a while. The proof would be if he were right, for say, forty seasons. I would even give him credit if he were right for 40 out of 50 seasons. I bet that over the long haul, he is right 50% of the time, maybe less, if he lets his biases control his forecasting.
Tony he deleted the post!!!
WINNING BIGLY!
He also could be right for 2 seasons by simply predicting
Post was supposed to go to Ziefle and was longer.
Sorry.
But maybe he’ll compensate for his removed post with:
I’m not understanding the Polar Vortex – tweet.